-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Return all visible events when no program specified [TECH-1663] #15549
Merged
enricocolasante
merged 9 commits into
master
from
TECH-1663-return-all-events-when-no-program
Nov 3, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0467bdd
fix: Return all visible events when no program specified [TECH-1663]
muilpp 6345c68
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into TECH-1663-return-al…
muilpp 33cb9ca
fix: Return search scope and capture scope in old api [TECH-1663]
muilpp d303dcf
fix: Return all visible events when mode selected [TECH-1663]
muilpp 7145c22
fix: Return all visible events when mode selected [TECH-1663]
muilpp 19f89b8
fix: Return all visible events when mode selected [TECH-1663]
muilpp 7ffeb9d
Merge branch 'master' into TECH-1663-return-all-events-when-no-program
muilpp bc761a4
fix: Add capture scope org unit to integration test [TECH-1633]
muilpp 252ad18
Merge branch 'master' into TECH-1663-return-all-events-when-no-program
muilpp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to move
mapSqlParameterSource.addValue(COLUMN_ORG_UNIT_PATH, params.getOrgUnit().getPath()); mapSqlParameterSource.addValue(COLUMN_USER_UID, user.getUid());
to
getOrgUnitSql
method and remove the addValue operation from the single methods?It seems to me that it would simplify the code quite a bit even if we will end up with a value in the parameter source that is not used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem with that would be that modes
CAPTURE
andACCESSIBLE
don't have an orgUnit in the request, so callingparams.getOrgUnit().getPath()
ingetOrgUnitSql
would result in a NPE for these two cases.Also, there's the scheduler running tasks with a null user. Since it's a system user, we assume it will use the mode
ALL
, but in that case callinguser.getUid()
would fail too.