chore(ci): Re-enable deploy to yt01

[oskogstad]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml. The primary change involves uncommenting the push event trigger, specifically enabling the workflow to be activated when version tags matching the pattern "v*.." are pushed. This modification allows the workflow to automatically respond to version tag pushes while maintaining its existing job structure and dependencies.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml	Added push event trigger for version tags (pattern: "v*..")

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c586fa and 132f72c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (2)

Line range hint 11-12: LGTM! Concurrency is properly configured.

The concurrency group using ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref_name }} ensures that multiple deployments of the same version cannot run simultaneously, preventing deployment conflicts.

---

5-7: LGTM! The push event trigger is properly configured.

The tag pattern "v*.." follows semantic versioning convention, which is appropriate for deployment triggers. The workflow will now automatically run on version tag pushes while still allowing manual triggers via workflow_dispatch.

Let's verify the tag pattern usage in the repository:

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the concurrency settings to ensure there won't be deployment conflicts.

---

✅ Tag-based trigger and concurrency settings are properly configured

The verification confirms:

• No existing tags in the repository, which means a clean slate for implementing semantic versioning
• Concurrency is properly configured using workflow name and ref_name as the group key, which will prevent concurrent deployments of the same version
• The tag pattern "v*.." in the trigger follows semantic versioning convention

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the repository follows the expected version tag pattern

# Check recent tags
git tag -l "v*.*.*" --sort=-v:refname | head -n 5

# Verify no unexpected tag patterns that might trigger this workflow
git tag -l | grep -v "^v[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.[0-9]*$" || echo "All tags follow semantic versioning"

Length of output: 183

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check concurrency settings in the workflow file
cat .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml | grep -A 2 "concurrency:"

Length of output: 132

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud