Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update action.yml #1856

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Update action.yml #1856

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

motatoes
Copy link
Contributor

@motatoes motatoes commented Dec 16, 2024

Seems that a terraform caching bug was introduced after renaming the cache-key in #1750 and its fixed in this PR to have a same cache name

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Optimized caching mechanism for improved performance.
  • Chores

    • Updated cache path and key format for better organization.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the action.yml file, focusing on the caching mechanism for the Digger GitHub Action. The changes primarily involve adjusting the cache path and key generation strategy, moving from Golang environment-specific caching to a more generalized approach using ${{ github.workspace }}/cache and a new cache key format based on file hashing. The core functionality of setting up cloud services and managing Terraform collaboration remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
action.yml - Modified cache path to ${{ github.workspace }}/cache
- Updated cache key to digger-cache-${{ hashFiles('**/cache') }}
- Maintained existing input parameter structure and cloud service setup logic

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Caching Delight

In GitHub's garden, a cache so bright,
Paths rearranged with algorithmic might,
Workspace and hashes, a new design,
Digger's action, now more refined!

🚀 Hop, hop, hurray! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

delve-auditor bot commented Dec 16, 2024

No security or compliance issues detected. Reviewed everything up to 4f9134b.

Security Overview
  • 🔎 Scanned files: 1 changed file(s)
Detected Code Changes
Change Type Relevant files
Configuration changes ► action.yml
    Update cache path and key configuration
Diagnostics
  • Code Scan ID: 0db64b5f-5464-4305-a7d6-553c39878979

Reply to this PR with @delve-auditor followed by a description of what change you want and we'll auto-submit a change to this PR to implement it.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
action.yml (1)

433-433: Remove trailing spaces

There are trailing spaces at the end of line 433.

-        
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 433-433: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 706ecf2 and 4f9134b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • action.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
action.yml

[error] 433-433: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
action.yml (1)

431-433: Cache directory configuration looks good!

The setup properly configures both Terraform and Terragrunt cache directories using workspace-relative paths.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 433-433: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Comment on lines +431 to +432
path: ${{ github.workspace }}/cache
key: digger-cache-${{ hashFiles('**/cache') }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix cache key generation strategy

The current implementation has several issues:

  1. Using hashFiles('**/cache') creates a circular dependency where cache contents determine their own key
  2. This can lead to unnecessary cache misses and performance issues
  3. The save key doesn't match the restore key, which breaks cache consistency
-        key: digger-cache-${{ hashFiles('**/cache') }}
+        key: digger-cache-${{ runner.os }}-${{ runner.arch }}-${{ hashFiles('**/go.mod', '**/go.sum') }}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
path: ${{ github.workspace }}/cache
key: digger-cache-${{ hashFiles('**/cache') }}
path: ${{ github.workspace }}/cache
key: digger-cache-${{ runner.os }}-${{ runner.arch }}-${{ hashFiles('**/go.mod', '**/go.sum') }}

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve cache key strategy to prevent collisions

The current cache key strategy might lead to cache collisions and staleness. Consider incorporating:

  • Workflow-specific identifiers
  • OS/architecture information
  • Dependency version hashes
-        key: digger-cache
-        restore-keys: |
-          digger-cache
+        key: digger-cache-${{ runner.os }}-${{ runner.arch }}-${{ hashFiles('**/go.mod', '**/go.sum') }}
+        restore-keys: |
+          digger-cache-${{ runner.os }}-${{ runner.arch }}-
+          digger-cache-${{ runner.os }}-

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@motatoes motatoes merged commit 15b7491 into develop Dec 16, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant