Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #20621 Comparing addresses of rvalue reference parameters not cor… #20622

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2024

Conversation

WalterBright
Copy link
Member

…rect

#20621

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request, @WalterBright!

Bugzilla references

Your PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue.

If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog.

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Warnings ⚠️⚠️⚠️

  • In preparation for migrating from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues, the issue reference syntax has changed. Please add the word "Bugzilla" to issue references. For example, Fix Bugzilla Issue 12345 or Fix Bugzilla 12345.(Reminder: the edit needs to be done in the Git commit message, not the GitHub pull request.)

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + dmd#20622"

@WalterBright
Copy link
Member Author

As usual, this does not fail in the test suite. It fails compiling druntime, which is done before the test suite, so of course it means a lot of work to try to isolate the problem. How can I emphasize the test suite should be run first, not last? The error:

core.exception.AssertError@src\dmd\backend\inliner.d(519): Assertion failure
el:0F2B0950 cnt=0 rpair TYulong 0F2AD980 14691C98
 el:0F2AD980 cnt=0 relconst TY*  0+& __B6C5897553EA1E3D4639405AE120F017
 el:14691C98 cnt=0 const TYuint 34L 

@WalterBright WalterBright force-pushed the g20621 branch 7 times, most recently from 0288ee4 to 96f2a7e Compare December 31, 2024 08:09
@thewilsonator thewilsonator merged commit c57da0c into dlang:master Dec 31, 2024
41 checks passed
@WalterBright
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, @thewilsonator !

@WalterBright WalterBright deleted the g20621 branch December 31, 2024 09:17
@thewilsonator
Copy link
Contributor

No problem. Btw could you take a look at #20277 when you get the chance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Comparing addresses of rvalue reference parameters not correct
3 participants