-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build: infer platform from first node if none set #2131
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aa0aeac
build: move solve opt out of duplicate map
jedevc aac7a47
build: fix incorrect solve opt platform from being set
jedevc 5403231
build: infer platform from first node if none set
crazy-max 9d8ac1c
build: move solveOpt to local struct type
crazy-max File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The real issue is that the platform in
opt
gets reset when it should not. We need to figure out a test to make sure it doesn't happen. Looks like the old build code only expect "resolveNode" to have a platform if it is an override to the existing platform but maybe this should be made safer (more explicit) somehow.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rebased on top of @jedevc changes in master...jedevc:buildx:fix-setting-wrong-platform-on-solve-opt to fix the solve opt case and remove the duplicated map.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not convinced we have to change this, I think we could leave the default to be the current platform - this change isn't actually needed to fix the regression.
However, no real objections, my use case for this was to ease some UX issues with docker cloud build, which I don't really have any more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess you talk about the
TestSelectNodeNoPlatform
and default spec case right? It seems related to #2119 and proposed new rules in #2119 (comment) should cover this in follow-up iiuc.