Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use flatpak-spawn to run Google Chrome #13

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cosimoc
Copy link
Contributor

@cosimoc cosimoc commented Aug 8, 2018

This allows us to make a self-contained extra-data flatpak that does
not need to rely on anything on the host to work.

CC @ramcq.
Caveat: I haven't fully tested this yet, but it seems to work well enough for me to open this PR.

@cosimoc cosimoc force-pushed the wip/cosimoc/builtin branch 2 times, most recently from 546b7f4 to 6b489e4 Compare August 9, 2018 15:16
Copy link
Contributor

@ramcq ramcq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's actually a lot simpler than I thought! Maybe too simple. Couple of tweaks to do. :)

@@ -3,26 +3,18 @@
"runtime": "org.freedesktop.Platform",
"runtime-version": "1.6",
"sdk": "org.freedesktop.Sdk",
"command": "/app/bin/eos-google-chrome-app",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The launcher in the OS depends on this entry point existing, so I don't think we should change it (or we provide a compat symlink) - https://github.com/endlessm/eos-browser-tools/blob/master/chrome-helper/eos-google-chrome.py#L86

This means the script needs to handle two things - either running inside the flatpak and doing the spawn trick, or outside and maybe just re-execing itself with flatpak, for consistency (and no need to do the pipe that keeps the flatpak alive etc).

To rely on the regular launch behaviour in the OS, we can use an eufi "upgrade" method in the OS so that we can drop the launcher hacks, but we can't sequence the upgrade the other way (prevent an older OS getting a new Flatpak).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My idea for the transition was that the "self-contained" version of the app was only ever hosted on Flathub, not on eos-apps. (In that sense this PR is more of a RFC than something to merge right away here.)
So older OS would never get this new one and we would not worry about keeping the legacy launcher; in the same OS update we would remove all the launcher stuff and add the migration to the Flathub version.
Is that possible?

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
#!/bin/bash
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It always starts with a simple/innocent shell script... and then... :P Maybe it's fine. I would keep a low threshold for doing a Python ver if the complexity creeps up.

chrome_flatpak_dir=`flatpak-spawn --host flatpak info -l com.google.Chrome`
chrome_binary=${chrome_flatpak_dir}/files/extra/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome

exec flatpak-spawn --host --env=LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${chrome_flatpak_dir}/files/lib ${chrome_binary}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should do some $* or we'll break the methods in the desktop file, or other scripts that rely on passing arguments in to the browser.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I had this in a later version of the patch. Pushed here now.

This allows us to make a self-contained extra-data flatpak that does
not need to rely on anything on the host to work.
Newer Chrome versions do not seem to use these.
Instead of importing a copy here.
@cosimoc cosimoc force-pushed the wip/cosimoc/builtin branch from 6b489e4 to 05b4365 Compare August 10, 2018 21:49
This is needed to run on Fedora Silverblue.
We need those for the appinfo integration. We export all the other
sizes from the downloaded deb package.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants