Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs Update: Add Reown to the "Account Abstraction" doc page #1168

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rohit-710
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR adds adds Reown to the account abstraction doc page.

Tests

N/A

@rohit-710 rohit-710 requested review from 0xmariniere and a team as code owners December 9, 2024 15:59
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 70334f0
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/675875ee62b6d7000837398d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1168--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the document titled "Account abstraction" by adding a new entry for the provider "Reown." This entry is included in the "Account abstraction tools" section and describes Reown's AppKit SDK, which allows developers to create smart wallets using social logins. The addition is formatted to align with existing entries, ensuring consistency in presentation throughout the document. No other significant modifications to the content or structure of the document were made.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update account-abstraction.mdx #800: This PR adds a new entry for Openfort in the same document, account-abstraction.mdx, which is directly related to the main PR's addition of Reown, both enhancing the resources available for account abstraction tools.
  • Update account-abstraction.mdx #830: This PR introduces a new section for Thirdweb in the same document, account-abstraction.mdx, which is also related to the main PR's update, as both PRs aim to expand the documentation on account abstraction tools for developers.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • 0xmariniere
  • cpengilly

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5010883 and 70334f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/builders/tools/build/account-abstraction.mdx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pages/builders/tools/build/account-abstraction.mdx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e869986 and dec06a9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/builders/tools/build/account-abstraction.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/tools/build/account-abstraction.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/builders/tools/build/account-abstraction.mdx (1)

51-52: Entry format and content alignment looks good

The new Reown entry maintains consistency with other entries in terms of structure, technical detail level, and formatting style.

pages/builders/tools/build/account-abstraction.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@rohit-710
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @0xmariniere and @krofax, just wanted to quickly follow up here and get it approved!

@rohit-710
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @0xmariniere and @krofax, just wanted to quickly follow up here. Please let me know if you can review this and merge it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants