Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(dependency-set): specify that dependency is bidirectional #480

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

qbzzt
Copy link
Contributor

@qbzzt qbzzt commented Dec 12, 2024

Description

Change the specs to match what I heard from @zainbacchus in our call today (unless I misunderstood).

Tests

N/A

Additional context

N/A

Metadata

N/A

@tynes
Copy link
Contributor

tynes commented Dec 13, 2024

I think this needs a bit more explaining, specifically around why and how. Perhaps this information isn't super legible, its part of #465

@zainbacchus
Copy link

This should be helpful: ethereum-optimism/docs#1171

@zainbacchus
Copy link

Closing this as this change was reverted. See:ethereum-optimism/docs#1186

@qbzzt
Copy link
Contributor Author

qbzzt commented Dec 19, 2024

I don't understand. Can chainA be in the dependency set of chainB if chainB is not in the dependency set of chainA? In other words, is it possible for me to send an interop message A->B, but not B->A? If so then the change I proposed is wrong. If not, it is necessary for accuracy.

Changing the docs should not affect the specs, IMAO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants