PortalNetwork: Implement UltralightProvider Enhancements for EIP-1193 JSON-RPC Support

[cjustinobi]

Key Enhancements:

1. EIP-1193 Method Support:

   • Implements commonly used Ethereum JSON-RPC methods:
     • eth_getBlockByHash
     • eth_getBlockByNumber
     • eth_getTransactionCount
     • eth_getCode
     • eth_getBalance
     • eth_getStorageAt
     • eth_call

2. Error Handling:

   • Adds robust error codes and messages based on JSON-RPC specifications:
     • 4200 for unsupported methods.
     • -32602 for invalid parameters.
     • -32603 for internal errors.

3. Removed unused methods from provider.spec.ts

[acolytec3]

This is looking great so far. One thing we need to address is that the provider should return JSON-RPC formatted data and not just the raw block/transaction/state data our portalnetwork.ETH module returns. If you want to do that work as well, let me know and I can provide guidance on next steps or else I can do that in a subsequent PR.

Basically, we need to use these helpers with some slight edits that I can outline.

[cjustinobi]

This is looking great so far. One thing we need to address is that the provider should return JSON-RPC formatted data and not just the raw block/transaction/state data our portalnetwork.ETH module returns. If you want to do that work as well, let me know and I can provide guidance on next steps or else I can do that in a subsequent PR.

Basically, we need to use these helpers with some slight edits that I can outline.

Please go ahead with the guidance. Would love to handle as well

[acolytec3]

To make the provider fully EIP compliant, each of the supported methods needs to return the values formatted to match the Ethereum JSON-RPC specification. So for each method listed in the PR description, you need to verify that the values returned by that method correspond to the JSON-RPC spec.

For the methods that return blocks, you can copy the the toJSONRPCBlock from the ethereumjs-monorepo client helpers here.

You'll need to update the toJSONRPCBlock method to remove the chainId parameter and then remove the totalDifficulty calculation. Instead, just use the difficulty from the block header object as that field in the return value.

For the other methods (getCode, getBalance, getStorage, call), you can reference the corresponding methods in the eth module in the ethereumjs client RPC implementation as a reference point for how to format the return values (or just reference the official spec).

Also, if you can update your test script to make calls to these additional methods, that would be great. For the state related methods, you'll have to pick an account that was present in the Ethereum state in ancient chain history (so maybe before block 10000000) since the state network doesn't fully support current state yet. Let me know if you need help with this part of it.

[cjustinobi]

To make the provider fully EIP compliant, each of the supported methods needs to return the values formatted to match the Ethereum JSON-RPC specification. So for each method listed in the PR description, you need to verify that the values returned by that method correspond to the JSON-RPC spec.

For the methods that return blocks, you can copy the the toJSONRPCBlock from the ethereumjs-monorepo client helpers here.

You'll need to update the toJSONRPCBlock method to remove the chainId parameter and then remove the totalDifficulty calculation. Instead, just use the difficulty from the block header object as that field in the return value.

For the other methods (getCode, getBalance, getStorage, call), you can reference the corresponding methods in the eth module in the ethereumjs client RPC implementation as a reference point for how to format the return values (or just reference the official spec).

Also, if you can update your test script to make calls to these additional methods, that would be great. For the state related methods, you'll have to pick an account that was present in the Ethereum state in ancient chain history (so maybe before block 10000000) since the state network doesn't fully support current state yet. Let me know if you need help with this part of it.

Got it