Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.

Add new VoVNet backbone networks into README.md #1026

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stigma0617
Copy link

we propose an energy and computation efficient backbone network, called VoVNet, which is better and faster than ResNet backbone in terms of accuracy and speed both.
We adopt VoVNet into the maskrcnn-benchmark.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need the corporate CLA signed.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Aug 8, 2019
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks!

@botcs
Copy link
Contributor

botcs commented Sep 16, 2019

Hi @stigma0617,

Could you do please a comparison with the baseline models regarding speed and accuracy performance?

Seeing ResNet-50, -101, and lightweight baselines would be promising.

@Anustup900
Copy link

Hey @stigma0617 @botcs , I have worked in this comparisons between Res Net 50 -101 before with Tensorflow , love to work in this issue , can it be assigned to me ?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
awaiting response CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants