Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upstream ArrayNode DataMode + BindingData LiteralOffloadedMetadata idl changes #6074

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

pvditt
Copy link
Contributor

@pvditt pvditt commented Dec 3, 2024

Tracking issue

#3573

Why are the changes needed?

Adding support for mapping over reference tasks. Will open source the changes in a follow up PR

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Updating IDL for ArrayNode + BindingData to support mapping over reference tasks (will all be upstreamed to OSS)

How was this patch tested?

Setup process

Screenshots

Check all the applicable boxes

  • I updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

Signed-off-by: Paul Dittamo <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 6.89655% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.98%. Comparing base (87ef4a0) to head (12aade0).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
flyteidl/gen/pb-go/flyteidl/core/workflow.pb.go 4.54% 21 Missing ⚠️
flyteidl/gen/pb-go/flyteidl/core/literals.pb.go 14.28% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6074      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.98%   36.98%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1318     1318              
  Lines      132449   132475      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits        48989    48991       +2     
- Misses      79207    79231      +24     
  Partials     4253     4253              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests-datacatalog 51.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteadmin 54.06% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytecopilot 30.99% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytectl 62.29% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteidl 7.23% <6.89%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests-flyteplugins 53.85% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytepropeller 42.60% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytestdlib 55.18% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eapolinario
Copy link
Contributor

@pvditt , what else is missing here?

@pvditt pvditt changed the title upstream DataMode upstream ArrayNode DataMode + BindingData LiteralOffloadedMetadata idl changes Dec 18, 2024
@pvditt pvditt marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 06:30
@pvditt pvditt requested a review from eapolinario December 18, 2024 06:33
@pvditt
Copy link
Contributor Author

pvditt commented Dec 18, 2024

@eapolinario

Was just waiting for the PR to get merged on our end. Will open source it, but will do that in a follow up as there's been a bit of divergence on our private fork for ArrayNode.

@eapolinario eapolinario merged commit b981363 into master Dec 19, 2024
50 of 52 checks passed
@eapolinario eapolinario deleted the upstream-data-mode-array-node branch December 19, 2024 19:18
eapolinario pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
…l changes (#6074)

* upstream DataMode

Signed-off-by: Paul Dittamo <[email protected]>

* update descriptions

Signed-off-by: Paul Dittamo <[email protected]>

* upstream binding data idl update

Signed-off-by: Paul Dittamo <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Paul Dittamo <[email protected]>
eapolinario added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
…l changes (#6074) (#6121)

* upstream DataMode



* update descriptions



* upstream binding data idl update



---------

Signed-off-by: Paul Dittamo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Paul Dittamo <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants