Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use GraalVM for JDK 21 in GitHub workflow #2765

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

Marcono1234
Copy link
Collaborator

Purpose

Upgrade to GraalVM for JDK 21 to avoid being stuck on old JDK 17 version

Description

GraalVM for JDK 17 does not receive any updates anymore (at least not under the "GraalVM Free Terms and Conditions")

See https://github.com/graalvm/setup-graalvm/tree/v1.2.4?tab=readme-ov-file#notes-on-oracle-graalvm-for-jdk-17

As mentioned there in the README and in graalvm/setup-graalvm#107 (comment), we will always be using Oracle GraalVM under the "GraalVM Free Terms and Conditions". After that expires (which for JDK 21 will be in September 2026, see also GraalVM licensing FAQ) we will simply be stuck on an unmaintained GraalVM version (unless we already migrated to GraalVM for JDK 25 in the meantime), but we won't accidentally use GraalVM under the Oracle Technology Network License Agreement and violate it by accident.

GraalVM for JDK 17 does not receive any updates anymore
(at least not under the "GraalVM Free Terms and Conditions")

See https://github.com/graalvm/setup-graalvm/tree/v1.2.4?tab=readme-ov-file#notes-on-oracle-graalvm-for-jdk-17
Copy link
Member

@eamonnmcmanus eamonnmcmanus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@eamonnmcmanus eamonnmcmanus merged commit 8757b0c into google:main Oct 18, 2024
11 checks passed
@Marcono1234 Marcono1234 deleted the graalvm-jdk21 branch October 20, 2024 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants