Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change: Replace pylint with ruff #1051

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2023
Merged

Change: Replace pylint with ruff #1051

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2023

Conversation

bjoernricks
Copy link
Contributor

What

Replace pylint with ruff

Why

Use ruff instead of pylint because ruff is so much faster.

@bjoernricks bjoernricks requested review from a team as code owners October 5, 2023 06:05
@bjoernricks bjoernricks enabled auto-merge (rebase) October 5, 2023 06:05
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Conventional Commits Report

Type Number
Changed 1

🚀 Conventional commits found.

Use ruff instead of pylint because ruff is so much faster.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1051 (00e3c92) into main (777fe61) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1051   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.10%   53.10%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        1064     1064           
=======================================
  Hits          565      565           
  Misses        499      499           
Files Coverage Δ
gvmtools/cli.py 0.00% <ø> (ø)
gvmtools/config.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
scripts/combine-reports.gmp.py 72.00% <ø> (ø)
scripts/ssv_csv.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@bjoernricks bjoernricks merged commit ead8998 into main Oct 5, 2023
18 of 19 checks passed
@bjoernricks bjoernricks deleted the ruff branch October 5, 2023 06:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants