-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
MLFN meeting at ACL 2017.08.05
Normunds Grūzītis edited this page Aug 27, 2017
·
27 revisions
Saturday, August 5, 2017, ~9:00-17:00
This is the day after the last workshop at ACL.
1400 Robson Street Vancouver, BC, Canada V6G 1B9 Tel: 604-687-0511 Fax: 604-687-2801Robson St. is a busy shopping and restaurant street in the West End neighborhood of Vancouver. According to Google maps, the Empire Landmark is a seven-minute walk from the ACL conference hotel, the Westin Bayshore.
Application areas:
- social science, analyzing politics/media, digital humanities?
- information extraction and inferencing (e.g. tourism domain, finance),knowledge base population, dialogue systems (are there dialogue corpora we should target? ICSI Switchboard, Meetings corpora?)
- Miriam has done a literature search on uses of FN in dialogue
- Sam: Publish the data with FE heads, or better yet, a full dependency-style parse. Finding exact spans is hard.
- Nathan: With cooperation from someone at Berkeley, may be able to find a student to help with heuristic conversion to some sort of CoNLL format.
- As a research project, worth looking into conversion between Univer Dependencies and FrameNet GF/PT syntax. Availability of data from various FrameNets. We want as much to be public as possible. Suggestion: Release beta-quality data early to get feedback.
- framenet-users mailing list (such as a Google Group)
- framenet-dev mailing list (for people developing FrameNets)
- GitHub issue tracker for each FrameNet
- Should other FrameNets move to the snazzy new annotation tool (currently called MFN)? Risk of many competing data formats. MFN ingests Berkeley-style XML. Latvian FrameNet is using WebAnno because it is dependency-based, which is not supported by MFN. Goal should be to make the MFN tool as attractive as possible so FrameNets will move away from legacy tools. Everyone will use MFN for the parallel annotation exercise.
- Improvements to FN quality and consistency discovered by ECG work
- Quality control check 1: For every pair of frames related by Inheritance or Perspective_on, if both frames have a non-core role of the same name, they should be mapped (?).
- Quality control check 2: Look for things like Agent FEs that are not connected by frame relations to Intentionally_act.
- Can you find an undergrad to write & run a bunch of consistency checking scripts, automate some of the improvements?
- Changes to the FrameNet data model that would support constructional work, or major restructuring. E.g.:
- changes to kinds of frame relations
- introduction of frame-evoking grammatical constructions alongside LUs
- restructure how causative frames and relations are handled
- treatment of metaphor and relationship to MetaNet
- better LU coverage (presence in the lexicon and annotation)
- more and better frames
- LSA/SCiL Jan. 2018, Salt Lake City
- BLS Feb. 2018, Berkeley
- GURT March 2018, DC
- LREC May 2018, Japan
- NAACL Jun. 2018, New Orleans
- ICCG Jul. 2018, Paris
- COLING Aug. 2018, Santa Fe
- EMNLP 2018: Sep./Oct.?
- Reports from FrameNets in other Languages (40 minutes)
- Kyoko Ohara: FrameNet vs. Constructicon: A Case study in Japanese FrameNet
- Key-Sun Choi: The current development of Korean FrameNet
- Normunds Grūzītis: Latvian FrameNet
- Collin Baker: Viewing FrameNet as Graph Structures (20 minutes)
- Ellen Dodge: Coordinated Development of Embodied Construction Grammar (ECG) and FrameNet (20 minutes)
- 10:30-10:45: Coffee Break
- Luca Gilardi: Richer data structures for FrameNets and Progress on Aligning across Language (25 minutes)
- Managing the emerging MLFN database--infrastructure for coordinated development
- Sam Thomson: Report from Noah Smith's ARK Lab (15 minutes)
- Open-SESAME: Frame-Semantic Parsing with Softmax-Margin Segmental RNNs and a Syntactic Scaffold
- Practicum on the new annotation tool from FrameNet Brasil (and ICSI) (40 minutes)
- (Now available for the parallel annotation task we decided on at our March meeting in Berkeley.)
- General discussion of topics from survey (listed below)
- Next steps for the MLFN resource:
- Display of MLFN data (on the ICSI public website?)
- Central annotation tool vs. separate annotation tools
- Coordination again, process for making new frames, what tools are needed? A frame creation wizard?
- Shared Annotation tasks and data extraction from them
- Multilingual annotation of both frames and constructions
- What sort of annotation will produce the most useful cross-linguistic information?
- (Preliminary) results of the parallel annotation study
- Tools for annotation and alignment of parallel and comparable texts
- Specifically, Web Tool (FrameNet Brasil) vs. WebAnno 3 (https://webanno.github.io)
- Determining how general semantic frames are; defining criteria for universal and language-specific frames
- How to deal with comparable situations with different framing in different languages
- Differences in frame usages across languages
- What are the implications for Frame Semantics and Construction Grammar of choosing to represent meaning in frames vs. constructions?
- What kinds of applications will MLFN have? How can we demonstrate, develop, and encourage others to develop them?
Multilingual FrameNet Project
International Computer Science Institute, 1947 Center St., Suite 600, Berkeley, CA, 94704