[SYCL][P2P] Fix info query for P2P

[JackAKirk]

There has been some confusion I think originating in the fact that L0 backend returned bool type instead of int for P2P queries. This issue is fixed here oneapi-src/unified-runtime#2246

This PR correspondingly updates the dpc++ runtime.

Fixes #15841

[JackAKirk]

@bso-intel Could you take a quick look at this so that we can merge these fixes?

Cmake will be updated when oneapi-src/unified-runtime#2246 is merged, so no need to worry about that.

Thanks

[pbalcer]

I merged the UR PR, please update the tags.

[JackAKirk]

I merged the UR PR, please update the tags.

Thanks, done.

[pbalcer]

@intel/llvm-reviewers-runtime please review, this is blocking UR updates.

[uditagarwal97]

LGTM, just one minor suggestion.

[JackAKirk]

All reviewers comments have been resolved and the UR tag is already updated. @intel/llvm-gatekeepers this is ready to merge.
Thanks

[sarnex]

@JackAKirk Could this HIP postcommit failure be related?

Failed Tests (1):
  SYCL :: Graph/Explicit/event_status_querying.cpp

https://github.com/intel/llvm/actions/runs/11612687147/job/32337271582

[JackAKirk]

@JackAKirk Could this HIP postcommit failure be related?

Failed Tests (1):
  SYCL :: Graph/Explicit/event_status_querying.cpp

https://github.com/intel/llvm/actions/runs/11612687147/job/32337271582

From looking at that Graph test and its includes I don't see how this PR could be related to that failure.
If there was not a recent PR that affects that code then this looks likely to be another flaky failure as a result of having a non officially supported ROCM card in the CI:

We have raised this issue several times both internally to line-management (and above) as well as via public issues. Here are a few examples I quickly found:

#7634 (comment)
#12997 (comment)
#14404
#14947