fix: 解决微信小程序滚动报错问题 #2832
fix: 解决微信小程序滚动报错问题 #2832
Conversation
Walkthrough本次更改涉及多个 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feat_v3.x #2832 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 84.00% 84.13% +0.13%
=============================================
Files 220 273 +53
Lines 17901 18101 +200
Branches 2678 2691 +13
=============================================
+ Hits 15038 15230 +192
- Misses 2858 2866 +8
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo4.tsx (1)
Line range hint
65-65: 建议完善文档和测试用例关于此次修复微信小程序滚动问题的改动，建议：
- 在组件文档中说明类名的使用方式和作用
- 添加微信小程序环境下的测试用例
- 考虑将滚动相关的样式封装为统一的类名，避免在每个 demo 中重复定义
需要我帮助编写文档或测试用例吗？
Also applies to: 116-116, 128-128
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo2.tsx(1 hunks)src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo3.tsx(1 hunks)src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo4.tsx(1 hunks)src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo5.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo3.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo5.tsx (1)
65-65: 建议验证类名更改是否解决了滚动问题
新增的类名 test-elevator5 似乎是为了解决微信小程序的滚动问题。建议：
- 确认这个类名是否有对应的样式定义
- 验证是否与
height="260"属性配合使用
src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo2.tsx (1)
116-116: 请说明类名变更的原因
将类名从 test-elevator1 更改为 test-elevator2 的具体原因不明确。建议：
- 在 PR 描述中说明这个改动的目的
- 确认是否需要迁移之前
test-elevator1的相关样式
✅ Verification successful
类名变更符合组件示例的命名规范
根据代码分析，每个 demo 文件都使用了与其文件编号对应的类名（demo2.tsx 使用 test-elevator2，demo3.tsx 使用 test-elevator3 等）。将类名从 test-elevator1 改为 test-elevator2 是为了与文件名 demo2.tsx 保持一致，这是一个合理的命名规范调整。
由于：
- demo1.tsx 中没有使用 test-elevator1 类名
- 其他 demo 文件都遵循了相同的命名模式
- 没有发现任何地方仍在使用 test-elevator1 类名
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查是否还有其他地方使用旧的类名
rg "test-elevator1"
Length of output: 19
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查所有包含 test-elevator 的类名使用情况
rg "test-elevator[0-9]?" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 1305
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 查找所有 demo 文件
fd "demo.*\.tsx?" src/packages/elevator/demos
Length of output: 467
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查 demo1.tsx 的内容
cat src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
Length of output: 1203
src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo4.tsx (1)
128-128: 建议确认粘性定位的兼容性
该组件使用了 sticky 属性，需要注意：
- 确认新增的类名
test-elevator4是否会影响粘性定位的行为 - 验证在微信小程序中
sticky和自定义类名的组合是否存在兼容性问题
✅ Verification successful
类名与粘性定位兼容性已验证
根据源码分析，sticky 属性和 className 的组合是安全的：
className被应用在最外层容器，不会影响内部粘性定位的实现- 粘性定位是通过条件渲染
elevator-list-fixed类实现的，与外层类名互不干扰 - 在小程序中也可以正常工作，因为实现方式不依赖于 CSS 的
position: sticky
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查其他使用 sticky 的示例
rg "sticky.*className" --type tsx
Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sticky and className patterns in all files
rg "sticky.*className|className.*sticky" -t ts -t tsx -t jsx -t js
# Find all demo files that might contain elevator examples
fd "demo.*\.(tsx?|jsx?)$" src/packages/elevator
# Check the implementation of the Elevator component
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Props {
$$$
sticky?: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 704
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Elevator component implementation
cat src/packages/elevator/elevator.tsx
# Check demo4 implementation to understand the context
cat src/packages/elevator/demos/taro/demo4.tsx
# Search for any sticky related tests or documentation
rg "sticky" -t md
Length of output: 14182
🤔 这个变动的性质是？
🔗 相关 Issue
💡 需求背景和解决方案
☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单
Summary by CodeRabbit
新功能
Demo2、Demo3、Demo4和Demo5组件中为Elevator组件添加了新的类名，以增强样式定制能力。样式
Demo2组件的Elevator类名为test-elevator2。Demo3、Demo4和Demo5组件分别添加了类名test-elevator3、test-elevator4和test-elevator5。