A better example of issues one can run into with variadic iteratees #54
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As indicated in the example I tried `['1', '2', '3'].forEach(parseInt);` and god `undefined` _as expected. I am not sure why would it output anything else, since forEach doesn't return anything, but when I run `['1', '2', '3'].map(parseInt);` I got `[1, NaN, NaN]` which is not what I expected. So I think this better illustrates the problem.
|
I've recently merged #62 which fixed the travis tests. Please could you rebase this PR to re-run the travis tests. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As indicated in the example I tried
['1', '2', '3'].forEach(parseInt);and gotundefinedas expected. I am not sure why would it output anything else, since forEach doesn't return anything, but when I run['1', '2', '3'].map(parseInt);I got[1, NaN, NaN]which is not what I expected. So I think this better illustrates the problem.