-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Segmented Crystal ECAL (SCEPCal) addition #406
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi Wonyong, thanks! Let's converge on the data model first. Can you answer the comments from key4hep/EDM4hep#380 ? |
Hi @wonyongc Thank you for this PR! I tried to compile the project with the key4hep nightlies, and I found the following error:
Do you have any hint about it? In addition, I have few comments:
Thank you for your time Best, |
8b3f899
to
8d32a69
Compare
Hi @BrieucF , @atolosadelgado , The error regarding I do however see a new error, which I believe is because the edm4hep changes are not merged in yet. The cmake step runs fine, but the make step fails at the linker stage:
I have sometimes seen this encoding error before with the linker (undefined symbol xxx with malformed strings, Thank you! |
|
detectorSegmentations/include/detectorSegmentations/DRCrystalHit.h
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…4hep DRCrystalHit and DRC files into one, updated CMakeLists to link libk4geoG4 to libdetectorSegmentations
@lopezzot removed the edits made for local testing - lol |
Tested all changes, this is ready to go from my end |
BEGINRELEASENOTES
ENDRELEASENOTES
Hi, I have been developing a full simulation for a segmented crystal ECAL (CalVision/MAXICC collaborations) and am now submitting PRs to get the simulation into key4hep.
I should note that I needed to make a new datatype to store the scintllation/cerenkov hit information for dual-readout. So far I have simply extended the edm4hep schema with a custom 'edm4dr' schema in the simulation repo, but to merge into k4geo, it seems like it would be a better option (or the only one) to have this new schema merged into the main edm4hep. I've opened a PR to do that here: key4hep/EDM4hep#380
Please let me know if I should take a different approach or if you have suggestions or changes I should make.
Thanks,
Wonyong