Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[KGA-4] [KGA-118] [KGA-119] [KGA-127] [KGA-133] fix: reentrancy check in eth_call #1582

Merged

Conversation

obatirou
Copy link
Collaborator

@obatirou obatirou commented Nov 6, 2024

code-423n4/2024-09-kakarot-findings#64

What is the new behavior?

Reentrancy check is moved at Kakarot level in eth_call


This change is Reviewable

Copy link

Copy link

@obatirou obatirou marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 16:12
Copy link
Member

@ClementWalter ClementWalter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add a e2e test plz

@obatirou obatirou force-pushed the reentrancy-check-kakarot-level branch from ac5e690 to 5eed36d Compare November 7, 2024 12:27
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.6%. Comparing base (3b4553f) to head (5eed36d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #1582     +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   63.5%   63.6%   +0.1%     
=======================================
  Files         44      44             
  Lines       8366    8338     -28     
=======================================
- Hits        5314    5309      -5     
+ Misses      3052    3029     -23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ClementWalter ClementWalter merged commit 6bb2809 into kkrt-labs:main Nov 8, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants