Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustfmt: Run on util/* (2/2) #3323

Open
wants to merge 23 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tnull
Copy link
Contributor

@tnull tnull commented Sep 18, 2024

This is PR 2/2, based on #3324.

The diff is a bit larger for this one, but AFAICT the changes look mostly reasonable (besides the oddity commented below).

FWIW, I had a look at currently open inflight PRs and the conflicts should be minimal if I'm not overlooking something.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.03883% with 185 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.28%. Comparing base (42cc4e7) to head (7153e35).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs 50.64% 8 Missing and 69 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs 84.47% 66 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/util/ser.rs 74.24% 17 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/util/ser_macros.rs 90.19% 9 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/util/wakers.rs 93.00% 5 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/util/transaction_utils.rs 94.17% 3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3323      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.31%   88.28%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         149      149              
  Lines      112839   113376     +537     
  Branches   112839   113376     +537     
==========================================
+ Hits        99655   100089     +434     
- Misses      10700    10765      +65     
- Partials     2484     2522      +38     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-util branch 2 times, most recently from 6c4dd83 to 9b991df Compare September 18, 2024 08:42
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Ugh, can we split this? 42 commits in one PR is just a lot...

@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Sep 18, 2024

Ugh, can we split this? 42 commits in one PR is just a lot...

Alright, happy to if you prefer (although at least half of these commits are one-line diffs). Now split out ~the first half of commits to #3324.

@tnull tnull changed the title rustfmt: Run on util/* rustfmt: Run on util/* (2/2) Sep 18, 2024
@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-util branch 2 times, most recently from 60ae0af to e2dcdc7 Compare September 19, 2024 08:10
@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Sep 19, 2024

Rebased after #3327 landed.

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-util branch from e2dcdc7 to bc122e3 Compare October 1, 2024 16:01
@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Oct 1, 2024

Rebased after #3324 landed.

@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Oct 7, 2024

Rebased to resolve minor conflicts.

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-util branch from 572f48c to 449a0d6 Compare November 5, 2024 09:13
@tnull tnull requested a review from TheBlueMatt November 5, 2024 09:14
@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Nov 5, 2024

Rebased once more to resolve minor conflicts.

Any additional comments here after we landed the split-out commits in #3324, @TheBlueMatt ?

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-util branch from 449a0d6 to b909a7a Compare November 18, 2024 17:57
@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Nov 18, 2024

Rebased once more to resolve minor conflicts.

Copy link
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some initial comments. Maybe could have been split across PRs.

lightning/src/util/ser_macros.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
lightning/src/util/ser_macros.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lightning/src/util/ser_macros.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lightning/src/util/ser_macros.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
lightning/src/util/ser_macros.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
lightning/src/util/ser_macros.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
do_test!(concat!("01", "08", "0100000000000000"), Some(72057594037927936), None, None, None);
do_test!(concat!("02", "08", "0000000000000226"), None, Some((0 << 30) | (0 << 5) | (550 << 0)), None, None);
do_test!(
concat!("01", "08", "0100000000000000"),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure how much readable it would be pulling out stuff here into variables? Seems that might just make stuff more confusing?

lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lightning/src/util/transaction_utils.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lightning/src/util/transaction_utils.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-util branch from b909a7a to 0750550 Compare December 3, 2024 12:27
@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Dec 3, 2024

Addressed all but one comment.

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-util branch from 0750550 to 03ccbe8 Compare December 18, 2024 08:42
@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Dec 18, 2024

Rebased once more to resolve minor conflict.

@TheBlueMatt any further comments here?

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-util branch from 03ccbe8 to 7153e35 Compare December 18, 2024 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants