Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement blockbeat #9315

Merged
merged 92 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Implement blockbeat #9315

merged 92 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

yyforyongyu
Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu commented Nov 27, 2024

Open this branch to keep track of rebase conflicts. This is the final branch that will be merged into the master once all the following PRs are done,

All the merged PRs have already been approved - unfortunately due to the rebase the commit hashes are different. Also added two minor commits in the end due to rebase,

  1. update fn to fn/v2.
  2. Fix another case in NotifyExitHopHtlc in addition to contractcourt: include custom records on replayed htlc #9357

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu added this to the v0.19.0 milestone Nov 27, 2024
@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu self-assigned this Nov 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Pull reviewers stats

Stats of the last 30 days for lnd:

User Total reviews Time to review Total comments
guggero
🥇
29
▀▀▀▀
15h 44m
31
▀▀
yyforyongyu
🥈
12
▀▀
1d 22h 51m
33
▀▀
ellemouton
🥉
11
16h 30m
21
Roasbeef
7
4d 13h 56m
▀▀
47
▀▀▀
ziggie1984
7
13h 30m
8
ProofOfKeags
3
5d 4h 23m
▀▀
10
bitromortac
3
16h 16m
1
Abdulkbk
3
13h 37m
2
ViktorTigerstrom
2
2d 14h 26m
5
alexbosworth
1
4d 11h 58m
▀▀
1
bhandras
1
12h
0

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu force-pushed the yy-feature-blockbeat branch 4 times, most recently from c472db5 to 837d5b0 Compare December 10, 2024 07:02
@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu force-pushed the yy-feature-blockbeat branch 4 times, most recently from 5439728 to e3a0878 Compare December 17, 2024 11:56
@saubyk saubyk requested a review from guggero December 19, 2024 15:21
@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu force-pushed the yy-feature-blockbeat branch 3 times, most recently from b4ab36c to 9c7b2e6 Compare December 20, 2024 06:42
@yyforyongyu
Copy link
Member Author

check commits CI failed due to no space left on device

yyforyongyu and others added 8 commits December 20, 2024 17:53
Also updated the loggings. This new state will be used in the following
commit.
This prepares the following commit where we now let the fee bumpr
decides whether to broadcast immediately or not.
This commit changes how inputs are handled upon receiving a bump result.
Previously the inputs are taken from the `BumpResult.Tx`, which is now
instead being handled locally as we will remember the input set when
sending the bump request, and handle this input set when a result is
received.
This commit adds a new method `handleInitialBroadcast` to handle the
initial broadcast. Previously we'd broadcast immediately inside
`Broadcast`, which soon will not work after the `blockbeat` is
implemented as the action to publish is now always triggered by a new
block. Meanwhile, we still keep the option to bypass the block trigger
so users can broadcast immediately by setting `Immediate` to true.
Previously in `markInputFailed`, we'd remove all inputs under the same
group via `removeExclusiveGroup`. This is wrong as when the current
sweep fails for this input, it shouldn't affect other inputs.
Also updated `handlePendingSweepsReq` to skip immature inputs so the
returned results are the same as those in pre-0.18.0.
Starting from this commit, we begin the process of flattening the
multi-hop itests to make them easier to be maintained. The tests are
refactored into their own test cases, with each test focusing on testing
one channel type. This is necessary to save effort for future
development.

These tests are also updated to reflect the new `blockbeat` behavior.
This commit simplfies the test since we only test the preimage
extraction logic in the htlc timeout resolver, there's no need to test
it for all different channel types as the resolver is made to be
oblivious about them.
Also flatten the tests to make them easier to be maintained.
The method `AssertActiveHtlcs` is now removed due to it's easy to be
misused. To assert a given htlc, use `AssertOutgoingHTLCActive` and
`AssertIncomingHTLCActive` instead for ensuring the HTLC exists in the
right direction. Although often the case `AssertNumActiveHtlcs` would be
enough as it implicitly checks the forwarding behavior for an
intermediate node by asserting there are always num_payment*2 HTLCs.
Copy link
Collaborator

@guggero guggero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing work on this!

Verified "Check Commits" CI step locally, everything looks good.

LGTM 🎉

@guggero guggero merged commit 8859dbc into master Dec 20, 2024
22 of 29 checks passed
@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu deleted the yy-feature-blockbeat branch December 20, 2024 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants