-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
allow value constructor param to be any constructor parameter, rather than only the first #398
allow value constructor param to be any constructor parameter, rather than only the first #398
Conversation
6b54d77
to
a1cde16
Compare
a1cde16
to
d3a872c
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #398 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.71% 85.71%
=======================================
Files 63 63
Lines 511 511
Branches 34 34
=======================================
Hits 438 438
Misses 73 73 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Thanks for this. I will definitely review this once I have some spare time 🙇♂️ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Left a question and two suggestions for reverting error messages.
++ on the simplification here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I'm holding off on merging until I have time to release a new version.
simplify and correct finding the constructor param index for the value param.
As a follow-up, I want to double-check whether we need to require -Yretain-trees.
Some of the boyscouting here is a matter of taste, if it's not to yours, I'm happy to revert.