Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FSTORE-1628] Update deequ for spark 3.5 support #421

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

bubriks
Copy link
Contributor

@bubriks bubriks commented Dec 2, 2024

This PR adds/fixes/changes...

  • please summarize your changes to the code
  • and make sure to include all changes to user-facing APIs

JIRA Issue: -

Priority for Review: -

Related PRs: -

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Unit Tests
  • Integration Tests
  • Manual Tests on VM

Checklist For The Assigned Reviewer:

- [ ] Checked if merge conflicts with master exist
- [ ] Checked if stylechecks for Java and Python pass
- [ ] Checked if all docstrings were added and/or updated appropriately
- [ ] Ran spellcheck on docstring
- [ ] Checked if guides & concepts need to be updated
- [ ] Checked if naming conventions for parameters and variables were followed
- [ ] Checked if private methods are properly declared and used
- [ ] Checked if hard-to-understand areas of code are commented
- [ ] Checked if tests are effective
- [ ] Built and deployed changes on dev VM and tested manually
- [x] (Checked if all type annotations were added and/or updated appropriately)

@bubriks bubriks changed the title update deequ [FSTORE-1628] Update deequ for spark 3.5 support Dec 2, 2024
@SirOibaf SirOibaf enabled auto-merge (squash) December 3, 2024 23:05
@SirOibaf SirOibaf merged commit 99bbaf5 into logicalclocks:main Dec 3, 2024
13 checks passed
davitbzh pushed a commit to davitbzh/hopsworks-api that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
bubriks added a commit to bubriks/hopsworks-api that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants