Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOCSP-45586: Remove What's New breaking changes #80
DOCSP-45586: Remove What's New breaking changes #80
Changes from 3 commits
34ea9ea
edb7081
ba38701
7de60ec
e849e64
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question/Suggestion: should we change the
.. contents::
component to be depth level 2? Each of the main headers have a few subsections so might be helpful to include those in the page ToC. If changing this results in the ToC becoming too lengthy/unwieldy, feel free to leaveThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed depth to 2 originally, but it did make the TOC look overly complicated (since the subheaders have long titles). So I think I'll leave as is
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nvm changed back to 2 after restructuring!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Possibly related (I do not fully understand the depth level discussion), I am in favor of removing the "Breaking Change Definition" and "Types of Breaking Changes" headers entirely while preserving the remaining content as-is, such that the current contents of each section just become contents of "Overview".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, Overview gets pretty long and disorganized if I remove those subheaders.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If so, I am fine with leaving them as-is.