Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the links to syntax description section #794

Merged

Conversation

Hunterness
Copy link
Collaborator

Since they were broken after it moved to the operations manual.

Also add a comment around the new vector index type where we explain different index types same as how it looks for full-text indexes.

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@Hunterness Hunterness force-pushed the dev-fix-links-to-syntax-descriptions branch from 4303fb6 to 1e4a3f4 Compare November 24, 2023 10:47
@AlexicaWright AlexicaWright merged commit b666d6c into neo4j:dev Nov 24, 2023
3 of 4 checks passed
@Hunterness Hunterness added the cherry-pick-this-to-5.x Cherry pick this PR changes to the 5.x branch label Nov 24, 2023
AlexicaWright pushed a commit to AlexicaWright/docs-cypher that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2023
Since they were broken after it moved to the operations manual.

Also add a comment around the new vector index type where we explain
different index types same as how it looks for full-text indexes.
AlexicaWright added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2023
Since they were broken after it moved to the operations manual.

Also add a comment around the new vector index type where we explain
different index types same as how it looks for full-text indexes.

Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-this-to-5.x Cherry pick this PR changes to the 5.x branch team-cypher-operations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants