Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Parallel runtime example query plan #860

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

JPryce-Aklundh
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh changed the title Update Parallel runtime example query Update Parallel runtime example query plan Jan 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@pontusmelke pontusmelke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

Do you think we should mention the partitioned scan in the section below that starts with A key difference...? Maybe something saying, "another difference is that when possible we use partitioned operators. Partitioned operators partition the data in different segments and operates on each segment in parallel" (or something like that)?

@JPryce-Aklundh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good - I'll review your PR about partitioned operators now, and then add something to this PR

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh merged commit bf15641 into neo4j:dev Jan 23, 2024
5 checks passed
@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh deleted the fix_parallel_query_plan branch January 23, 2024 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants