Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update information on db.transaction.timeout #1085

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

NataliaIvakina
Copy link
Contributor

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina commented Oct 11, 2023

Following the slack discussions and findings, I suggest the following amendments.
Do we have then to cherry-pick this PR to the branch 5.x to make it visible now?

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

Copy link
Member

@robsdedude robsdedude left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina merged commit 395764e into neo4j:dev Oct 12, 2023
2 checks passed
@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina deleted the dev-tx-timeout-fix branch October 12, 2023 14:19
NataliaIvakina added a commit to NataliaIvakina/docs-operations that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
Following the slack discussions and findings, I suggest the following
amendments.
Do we have then to cherry-pick this PR to the branch 5.x to make it
visible now?

---------

Co-authored-by: Robsdedude <[email protected]>
NataliaIvakina added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2023
Following the slack discussions and findings, I suggest the following
amendments.
Do we have then to cherry-pick this PR to the branch 5.x to make it
visible now?

---------

Co-authored-by: Robsdedude <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants