Test #9469
Test #9469
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Cypress GitHub Actions workflow configuration by adding the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/cypress.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/cypress.yaml (1)
7-7: Reconsider adding 'test' branch to workflow triggers
Adding the 'test' branch to CI triggers may lead to unnecessary workflow runs and increased resource consumption. Typically, test branches are temporary and shouldn't trigger CI workflows. Consider:
- Does this branch serve a specific long-term purpose in your branching strategy?
- Could these tests be run locally or in a more targeted way?
Let's check if there's a pattern of using test branches:
| - staging | ||
| workflow_dispatch: | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| cypress-run: | ||
| permissions: write-all | ||
| if: github.repository == 'ohcnetwork/care_fe' | ||
| if: github.repository == 'manmeetnagii/care_fe' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Repository condition change introduces security risks
The verification confirms critical security concerns:
-
The workflow has
write-allpermissions and handles sensitive operations including:- Access to repository secrets (JWKS_BASE64, CYPRESS_RECORD_KEY)
- Docker container operations with backend services
- Cypress test execution with record capabilities
-
All other security-critical workflows (CodeQL, OSSAR, deployments) are correctly restricted to 'ohcnetwork/care_fe', while this is the only workflow changed to run on a personal fork.
-
The workflow already has proper fork handling through
steps.pr_origin.outputs.is_forkedconditions, making the repository check redundant and potentially harmful.
Recommendation:
- if: github.repository == 'manmeetnagii/care_fe'
+ if: github.repository == 'ohcnetwork/care_fe'🔗 Analysis chain
SECURITY RISK: Workflow configured for personal fork instead of main repository
This change presents several critical concerns:
-
Security:
- The workflow has
write-allpermissions and runs with sensitive secrets - Running on a personal fork increases security risks
- Could potentially expose CYPRESS_RECORD_KEY and other secrets
- The workflow has
-
CI/CD Pipeline:
- Tests will only run on 'manmeetnagii/care_fe'
- Main repository ('ohcnetwork/care_fe') tests will be bypassed
Revert this change to maintain security and ensure proper CI/CD pipeline execution:
- if: github.repository == 'manmeetnagii/care_fe'
+ if: github.repository == 'ohcnetwork/care_fe'Let's verify the repository settings and permissions:
Let's examine the workflow file contents and any other repository conditions to better understand the security implications and verify if this is indeed a critical issue.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workflow permissions and secret usage
gh api repos/ohcnetwork/care_fe/actions/permissions
gh api repos/manmeetnagii/care_fe/actions/permissions
# List workflows using sensitive secrets
rg -l "secrets\." .github/workflows/
Length of output: 943
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workflow permissions and secrets usage in cypress.yaml
cat .github/workflows/cypress.yaml
# Check for any other repository conditions in workflows
rg -p "github.repository ==" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 6137
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx (3)
Line range hint
43-64: Consider adding type safety for query parametersWhile the implementation is functional, consider defining an interface for the query parameters to improve type safety and maintainability.
interface AssetQueryParams { name: string; serial_number: string; qr_code_id: string; page: number; facility?: string; location?: string; status?: string; warranty_amc_end_of_validity_before?: string; warranty_amc_end_of_validity_after?: string; }
323-348: Consider extracting shortcut keys as constantsThe search implementation is well-structured, but consider extracting the shortcut keys as constants to improve maintainability and prevent potential conflicts.
const SEARCH_SHORTCUTS = { NAME: 'n', SERIAL_NUMBER: 'u', QR_CODE: 'p' } as const; const searchOptions = [ { key: "name", label: "Name", shortcutKey: SEARCH_SHORTCUTS.NAME, // ... other properties }, // ... other options ];
407-412: Fix formatting issuesThere are minor formatting issues that should be addressed:
- Missing parentheses around icon JSX element
- Incorrect indentation in warrantyAmcValidityChip calculation
- icon: - <CareIcon - icon="l-import" - className="import-assets-button" - /> - , + icon: ( + <CareIcon + icon="l-import" + className="import-assets-button" + /> + ), - (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24), + (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24),Also applies to: 574-574
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 407-407: Insert
·((prettier/prettier)
[error] 412-412: Insert
)(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx(8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx
[error] 407-407: Insert ·(
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 412-412: Insert )
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 574-574: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx (3)
Line range hint 20-32: LGTM: Import changes and hook configuration updates are well-structured
The new imports and updated useFilters configuration properly support the enhanced search functionality with specific field caching.
123-124: LGTM: Proper authorization check implementation
The authorization check using NonReadOnlyUsers is correctly implemented to control button state based on user type.
Line range hint 354-473: LGTM: Improved layout and component integration
The layout changes enhance responsiveness, and the integration of the new Button component and search fields is well-implemented.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 407-407: Insert ·(
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 412-412: Insert )
(prettier/prettier)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx (2)
323-348: LGTM: Well-structured search configuration with keyboard shortcutsThe search configuration is well-implemented with proper TypeScript types and keyboard shortcuts for accessibility. Consider adding a comment documenting the shortcut keys for future maintainers.
+ // Keyboard shortcuts for search fields: + // - 'n': Search by Name + // - 'u': Search by Serial No. + // - 'p': Search by QR Code ID const searchOptions = [
33-33: Consider adding error boundariesGiven the complexity of this component and its various async operations (search, data fetching), consider implementing an error boundary to gracefully handle runtime errors and provide a better user experience.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx(8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx (4)
Line range hint 20-32: LGTM: Import changes and hook configuration updates
The new imports and updated useFilters configuration properly support the enhanced search functionality with multiple fields.
Also applies to: 46-46
43-43: LGTM: State and params updates
The new state variable and expanded params object properly handle the multiple search fields with appropriate default values.
Also applies to: 62-64
Line range hint 354-473: LGTM: Improved responsive layout
The layout changes properly handle different screen sizes with appropriate flex layouts and spacing. The Button component usage is consistent throughout the component.
591-591: LGTM: Consistent warning state styling
The Chip component styling for the warning state follows the established color scheme and design system.
| const authUser = useAuthUser(); | ||
| const isDisabled = !NonReadOnlyUsers(authUser.user_type); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Authorization checks need to be extended to other interactive elements
The authorization check (isDisabled) is only applied to the create asset button, but there are other interactive elements that modify state or trigger actions:
- QR scanner activation/deactivation buttons
- Advanced filter button
These elements should also be restricted for read-only users to maintain consistent authorization across the component.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent authorization checks across the component
The authorization check is implemented correctly for the create button. Let's verify if similar checks are needed for other interactive elements.
Let me gather more context about these interactive elements and their authorization checks.
Let me check if the isDisabled flag is consistently applied to all interactive elements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other interactive elements that might need authorization checks
rg -A 2 "onClick=" src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx
Length of output: 526
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the interactive elements
rg -B 5 -A 5 "onClick=" src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx
Length of output: 1446
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for disabled prop usage
rg "disabled=" src/components/Assets/AssetsList.tsx
Length of output: 87
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
testbranch for triggering tests.