Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a tensorrt backend #33
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add a tensorrt backend #33
Changes from 5 commits
3059a7e
17d6c48
2319618
5e12a29
d2a00a0
659d003
4f28496
99e9248
1901c87
d51139b
07af9dd
f661509
874414b
7255b8c
14d88f9
1b93698
5a372b1
57d3eeb
ef70e0d
a33112d
8fe0598
1da5436
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm leaving a comment here to remind me:
We need to do some memory measurement to figure out if all of these buffers are necessary. I wonder if allocating a buffer for Batch-Size [1, 2, 5, 10] or other combinations might be better.
THings to test:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another question we'll have to figure out: Should this be configurable via the init?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll do some tests to figure how much memory is needed for those buffers. Another thought is that if we don't get performance improvement with a larger batch size, we don't have to do that. Based on my tests, larger batch size will improve the inference time by 10% but lower the preprocessing performance, the overall performance is even a little lower than a small batch size.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This logic may need to be revisited if we decide not to have buffers [0->10], and instead have combinations of [1, 2, 5, 10], for example
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm starting to think that are too many constants and GridNet specific functions here, and it might be easier to make a separate class specifically for parsing GridNet bounding boxes.
For now, let's clean up the rest of the code first, then discuss how that would work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These constants are only necessary for detectors, maybe we need another parameter like
is_detector
in the constructor to indicate if this capsule a detector or classifier?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or we can check if these constants exist before we call the post process function
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, but I'm thinking that this is super duper specific to GridNet detectors particularly. Maybe we can just offer a function that for parsing GridNet detector outputs, and name it as such.
The benefit would be to separate all of these GridNet specific parameters out of the BaseTensorRTBackend 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great idea, we should have separate parsers for different architectures.