You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
it has been agreed that one of the goals of HAIP is to meet eIDAS 2.0/ARF requirements.
there, the plan seems to be to use SD-JWT VCM (https://github.com/danielfett/sd-jwt-vc-dm)
if so, HAIP should use sd-jwt vcdm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
WG discussion. HAIP can say that examples of SD-JWT VC can be compatible with w3c vcdm as in the examples in sd-jwt vcdm document. key point is to show that sd-jwt vc with w3c vcdm on top is allowed in HAIP, but w3c vcdm is not mandatory.
will need to decide which mechanism is used for status, schema and rendering when w3c vcdm on top of sd-jwt vc.
it has been agreed that one of the goals of HAIP is to meet eIDAS 2.0/ARF requirements.
there, the plan seems to be to use SD-JWT VCM (https://github.com/danielfett/sd-jwt-vc-dm)
if so, HAIP should use sd-jwt vcdm.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: