Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Patch rollout-batch-id even without rollout-id in workload #248

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

PersistentJZH
Copy link

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

  1. patch rollout-batch-id even without rollout-id in workload

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
#244

Ⅲ. Special notes for reviews

@PersistentJZH PersistentJZH force-pushed the zhihao/fix/fix-patch-rollout-batch-id branch from a702034 to 84a0e60 Compare December 26, 2024 08:40
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 44.95%. Comparing base (056c77d) to head (84a0e60).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #248      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   45.55%   44.95%   -0.60%     
==========================================
  Files          57       61       +4     
  Lines        6395     7002     +607     
==========================================
+ Hits         2913     3148     +235     
- Misses       2989     3309     +320     
- Partials      493      545      +52     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 44.95% <100.00%> (-0.60%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: zhihao jian <[email protected]>
@PersistentJZH PersistentJZH force-pushed the zhihao/fix/fix-patch-rollout-batch-id branch from 84a0e60 to eb69d8d Compare December 26, 2024 09:14
@furykerry
Copy link
Member

simply use revision id may not works for rollback cases, rollback also support mutli-batch rollback.

@PersistentJZH
Copy link
Author

simply use revision id may not works for rollback cases, rollback also support mutli-batch rollback.

can you give me a specific scenario so I can reproduce it? maybe can use the SafeEncodeString func to encode the revision id.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants