OCPBUGS-36735: Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA #112

thom311 · 2024-07-08T08:32:58Z

This is a backport of k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#301 to release-4.16 branch to fix OCPBUGS-30549. The 4.16.z issue is OCPBUGS-36735

Those upstream patches are already on latest master (release-4.17).

The patches were cherry-picked without manual modifications or conflicts in git.

It also contains a backport of 2f64420 , from k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni@2f64420

openshift-ci · 2024-07-08T08:34:41Z

Hi @thom311. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

bn222 · 2024-07-08T08:41:50Z

please use a merge commit instead.

bn222 · 2024-07-08T09:12:39Z

Discussed offline and this is not a sync. It's a bugfix. Please rename the PR name to OCPBUGS-30549: ...
and make sure that the jira bot is not reporting issues.

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-07-08T09:13:44Z

@thom311: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30549, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.16.z" version, but no target version was set
release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30549 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.17.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is a backport of k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#301 to release-4.16 branch to fix OCPBUGS-30549.

Those upstream patches are already on latest master (release-4.17).

The patches were cherry-picked without manual modifications or conflicts in git.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

zhaozhanqi · 2024-07-09T09:40:33Z

/retitle OCPBUGS-36735: Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-07-09T09:40:41Z

@thom311: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.17.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is a backport of k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#301 to release-4.16 branch to fix OCPBUGS-30549.

Those upstream patches are already on latest master (release-4.17).

The patches were cherry-picked without manual modifications or conflicts in git.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

zhaozhanqi · 2024-07-09T09:40:52Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-07-09T09:40:55Z

@zhaozhanqi: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.17.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

zhaozhanqi · 2024-07-09T09:42:48Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-07-09T09:42:51Z

@zhaozhanqi: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.17.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

zhaozhanqi · 2024-07-09T09:46:28Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-07-09T09:46:32Z

@zhaozhanqi: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735, which is invalid:

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30549 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

thom311 · 2024-07-09T10:32:42Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-07-09T10:32:49Z

@thom311: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.16.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.z)
bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note text is set and does not match the template
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30549 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30549 targets the "4.17.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.17.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhaozhanqi

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

asood-rh · 2024-07-31T17:30:25Z

/label cherry-pick-approved

Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]>

Previously, we called AnnounceIPs() right after configuring the interface. At that point, the interface was just recently set IFF_UP, and it might not yet have carrier. In that case, the messages will be lost. We will need to wait a bit for carrier. Since AnnounceIPs() is an optional performance improvement, let's first do all the important things. Move the non-critical call to the end. This will be interesting next, when we will do some additional waiting for the device to have carrier. Let's not do the waiting in the middle of the critical operations, but only at the end. Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]>

After setting up the interface, it might take a bit for kernel to detect carrier. If we then already send the GARP/NA packets, they are lost. Instead, wait for up to 200 msec for the interface to get carrier. This time is chosen somewhat arbitrarily. We don't want to block the process too long, but we also need to wait long enough, that kernel and driver has time to detect carrier. Also, while busy waiting, sleep with an exponential back-off time (growth factor 1.5). Fixes: c241dcb ('Send IPv4 GARP and IPv6 Unsolicited NA in "cmdAdd"') See-also: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-30549 Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]>

In the case where the Gratuitous ARPs send function failed we failed the all CNI create and revert the configuration Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sch <[email protected]>

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-08-19T12:15:28Z

@thom311: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.16.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note text is set and does not match the template
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30549 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30549 targets the "4.17.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.17.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhaozhanqi

In response to this:

This is a backport of k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#301 to release-4.16 branch to fix OCPBUGS-30549. The 4.16.z issue is OCPBUGS-36735

Those upstream patches are already on latest master (release-4.17).

The patches were cherry-picked without manual modifications or conflicts in git.

It also contains a backport of 2f64420 , from k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni@2f64420

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

SchSeba · 2024-08-19T12:44:30Z

lets wait for k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#307 to be on master and we can merge it here also
@thom311 what do you think?

thom311 · 2024-08-19T13:09:08Z

lets wait for k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#307 to be on master and we can merge it here also @thom311 what do you think?

One concern is that 307 enables optimistic DAD on the interface. I think that is the right thing to do, but it seems quite a large change (with potentially unknown consequences) for a "release-4.16" branch. Also, IPv6 is probably less important to warrant a backport.

But I don't mind. As you prefer. Setting back to Draft.

thom311 · 2024-08-28T06:17:56Z

@SchSeba hi. With #112 (comment) , I think this backport should not include k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#307, because that enables optimistic DAD for IPv6. That is a relatively new change, possibly wide-ranging, and I think it should spend some time on master before being backported to a stable branch (if ever).

I would un-Draft this PR and I think it's good as-is.

The branch only contains cherry-picks from origin/master branch (without manual changes).

openshift-ci · 2024-09-12T17:54:26Z

@thom311: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

SchSeba

/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel

openshift-ci · 2024-10-13T08:09:32Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: SchSeba, thom311, wizhaoredhat

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [SchSeba,wizhaoredhat]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-10-13T08:12:27Z

@thom311: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/sriov-cni#112

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36735 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is a backport of k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#301 to release-4.16 branch to fix OCPBUGS-30549. The 4.16.z issue is OCPBUGS-36735

Those upstream patches are already on latest master (release-4.17).

The patches were cherry-picked without manual modifications or conflicts in git.

It also contains a backport of 2f64420 , from k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni@2f64420

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-bot · 2024-10-13T10:24:31Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: sriov-cni
This PR has been included in build sriov-cni-container-v4.16.0-202410130935.p0.gd61383f.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-ci bot requested review from bn222 and wizhaoredhat July 8, 2024 08:34

openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 8, 2024

thom311 changed the title ~~[4.16] Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA~~ OCPBUGS-30549:[4.16] Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA Jul 8, 2024

openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. labels Jul 8, 2024

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 8, 2024

thom311 marked this pull request as draft July 8, 2024 09:43

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 8, 2024

openshift-ci bot changed the title ~~OCPBUGS-30549:[4.16] Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA~~ OCPBUGS-36735: Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA Jul 9, 2024

thom311 force-pushed the th/announce-ips-wait-carrier-4.16 branch from fa19d63 to 4c8f82e Compare July 9, 2024 10:31

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci bot requested a review from zhaozhanqi July 9, 2024 10:32

thom311 marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2024 10:33

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 30, 2024

openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jul 31, 2024

zeeke and others added 6 commits August 19, 2024 14:12

Add global NetlinkManager instance

904b163

Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]>

Reuse netlinkLib instance in AnnounceIPs()

8a9fa87

Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]>

Unit test for WaitForCarrier

7affa44

Co-authored-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <[email protected]>

Fix Gratuitous ARPs critical error on ipv6

43c8bcc

In the case where the Gratuitous ARPs send function failed we failed the all CNI create and revert the configuration Signed-off-by: Sebastian Sch <[email protected]>

thom311 force-pushed the th/announce-ips-wait-carrier-4.16 branch from 4c8f82e to 43c8bcc Compare August 19, 2024 12:14

thom311 marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2024 12:15

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 19, 2024

openshift-ci bot requested a review from Billy99 August 19, 2024 12:16

thom311 marked this pull request as draft August 19, 2024 13:09

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 19, 2024

thom311 marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2024 15:24

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 12, 2024

SchSeba approved these changes Oct 13, 2024

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Oct 13, 2024

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d61383f into openshift:release-4.16 Oct 13, 2024
4 checks passed

thom311 deleted the th/announce-ips-wait-carrier-4.16 branch November 18, 2024 21:07

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

OCPBUGS-36735: Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA #112

OCPBUGS-36735: Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA #112

thom311 commented Jul 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 8, 2024

bn222 commented Jul 8, 2024

bn222 commented Jul 8, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 8, 2024

zhaozhanqi commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

zhaozhanqi commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

zhaozhanqi commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

zhaozhanqi commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

thom311 commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

asood-rh commented Jul 31, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 19, 2024

SchSeba commented Aug 19, 2024

thom311 commented Aug 19, 2024

thom311 commented Aug 28, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 12, 2024

SchSeba left a comment

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 13, 2024

openshift-bot commented Oct 13, 2024

OCPBUGS-36735: Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA #112

OCPBUGS-36735: Wait for carrier before announcing IPs via GARP/NA #112

Conversation

thom311 commented Jul 8, 2024 • edited Loading

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 8, 2024

bn222 commented Jul 8, 2024

bn222 commented Jul 8, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 8, 2024

zhaozhanqi commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

zhaozhanqi commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

zhaozhanqi commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

zhaozhanqi commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

thom311 commented Jul 9, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 9, 2024

asood-rh commented Jul 31, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 19, 2024

SchSeba commented Aug 19, 2024

thom311 commented Aug 19, 2024

thom311 commented Aug 28, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 12, 2024

SchSeba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 13, 2024

openshift-bot commented Oct 13, 2024

thom311 commented Jul 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading