Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to scraperlib v3.4.0 to use VP9 #239

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Upgrade to scraperlib v3.4.0 to use VP9 #239

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 24, 2024

Conversation

dan-niles
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #235
Closes #211

Implemented the same from #236.

  • Update dependencies (Mainly zimscraperlib to 3.4.0)
  • Implement bootstrap v1.0.2 (fixes to code coverage upload)

@dan-niles dan-niles self-assigned this Jun 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 1.62%. Comparing base (cbf18d1) to head (c2eaefa).
Report is 36 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main    #239      +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage   1.83%   1.62%   -0.22%     
========================================
  Files         10      11       +1     
  Lines        928    1049     +121     
  Branches     147     158      +11     
========================================
  Hits          17      17              
- Misses       911    1032     +121     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dan-niles dan-niles changed the title Scraperlib 3 4 0 v3 Upgrade to scraperlib v3.4.0 to use VP9 Jun 24, 2024
@dan-niles dan-niles marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2024 12:04
@dan-niles dan-niles requested a review from benoit74 June 24, 2024 12:04
@benoit74
Copy link
Collaborator

I've added the configuration which is expected to not raise anymore codecov problems, since for now we do not have proper unit testing of scrapers anyway.

Copy link
Collaborator

@benoit74 benoit74 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

@benoit74 benoit74 merged commit d0212f9 into main Jun 24, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@benoit74 benoit74 deleted the scraperlib_3_4_0_v3 branch June 24, 2024 13:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Migrate to scraperlib 3.4.0 and VP9 presets Fix code coverage test for scraper
2 participants