Fix typos in documentation #8917
Conversation
Vikt0rPavlik
requested review from
czarcas7ic,
p0mvn,
mattverse and
AlpinYukseloglu
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
C:docs
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (1.62.2)level=warning msg="The linter 'exportloopref' is deprecated (since v1.60.2) due to: Since Go1.22 (loopvar) this linter is no longer relevant. Replaced by copyloopvar." WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses documentation updates and minor textual corrections across multiple files in the Osmosis project. The changes include a typo fix in a genesis validator documentation, comment corrections in a test file, and a comprehensive update to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
x/poolmanager/README.md (3)
Line range hint
1-24: Documentation structure looks good, with minor suggestions for improvement.The overall structure is clear and well-organized. Consider adding:
- A table of contents for easier navigation
- A section on error handling and common troubleshooting scenarios
- Version compatibility information
Line range hint
142-520: Consider adding practical examples for route splitting scenarios.While the technical explanation is thorough, adding real-world examples of route splitting scenarios would help users better understand when and how to use this feature effectively.
Consider adding examples like:
### Route Splitting Example Given a large OSMO -> ATOM swap: 1. 40% through Pool A (OSMO/ATOM) with 0.2% spread 2. 60% through Pool B (OSMO/ATOM) with 0.3% spread This split reduces price impact compared to executing 100% through either pool.
Line range hint
521-1000: Consider adding flow diagrams for taker fee distribution.The taker fees section is comprehensive and well-documented. To enhance understanding, consider adding:
- A flow diagram showing the distribution of taker fees
- A sequence diagram illustrating the lifecycle of a taker fee from collection to distribution
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
networks/genesis-validators.md(2 hunks)simulation/simtypes/randmanager_test.go(2 hunks)x/poolmanager/README.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- networks/genesis-validators.md
- simulation/simtypes/randmanager_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
x/poolmanager/README.md (1)
Line range hint 25-141: LGTM! Pool creation section is technically accurate and well-documented.
The explanation of pool creation and routing is clear and accurate. The code examples effectively illustrate the concepts.
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses three distinct documentation updates across different files in the Osmosis project. The changes include a typo correction in a genesis validator guide, comment improvements in a test file, and a comprehensive expansion of the poolmanager module's README documentation. These modifications aim to enhance clarity, readability, and provide more detailed explanations of the project's functionality. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
x/poolmanager/README.md (1)
521-521: Consider adding section numbers for better navigationThe documentation could benefit from section numbers (e.g., "1. Overview", "2. Pool Creation", etc.) to make it easier for readers to navigate and reference specific sections.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
networks/genesis-validators.md(2 hunks)simulation/simtypes/randmanager_test.go(2 hunks)x/poolmanager/README.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- simulation/simtypes/randmanager_test.go
- networks/genesis-validators.md
🔇 Additional comments (3)
x/poolmanager/README.md (3)
Line range hint 1-521: Documentation is comprehensive and well-structured!
The poolmanager module documentation provides a thorough explanation of its functionality, including pool creation, swaps, multi-hop operations, and route splitting. The technical details are accurate and supported by clear code examples.
Line range hint 521-700: Excellent explanation of taker fees with practical examples!
The taker fees section effectively explains complex concepts through clear examples, making it easier to understand how fees are calculated and distributed in different scenarios.
Line range hint 700-800: Well-documented caching mechanism for performance optimization
The documentation clearly explains the purpose and implementation of caching maps for taker fee share agreements and registered alloyed pools, including their initialization and usage patterns.
WalkthroughThis pull request contains documentation and comment improvements across three different files. The changes include a typo correction in a validator guide, minor comment refinements in a test file, and a comprehensive update to the README for the poolmanager module. These modifications aim to enhance clarity, provide more detailed explanations, and improve the overall documentation quality without altering any functional code. Changes
Suggested Reviewers
Note: No sequence diagram was generated as the changes are primarily documentation and comment-related, without significant changes to system interactions or control flow. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
x/poolmanager/README.md (3)
Line range hint
118-196: Consider adding sequence diagrams for swap flows.While the swap operations section is well-documented, visual sequence diagrams would help readers better understand the message flow and interactions between different components.
Line range hint
521-892: Consider adding examples with actual numbers for taker fee calculations.While the taker fee distribution examples are good, adding concrete numerical examples with step-by-step calculations would make it easier to understand the fee distribution logic.
Line range hint
1-958: Consider adding a table of contents.Given the length and depth of the documentation, a table of contents at the beginning would help readers navigate through different sections more easily.
Consider adding this at the beginning of the file:
# Pool Manager Module + ## Table of Contents + + - [Overview](#overview) + - [Pool Creation & ID Management](#pool-creation--id-management) + - [Swaps](#swaps) + - [Multi-Hop](#multi-hop) + - [Route Splitting](#route-splitting) + - [EstimateTradeBasedOnPriceImpact Query](#estimatetradebasedonpriceimpact-query) + - [Taker Fees](#taker-fees) + - [Cached Maps](#cached-maps-takerfeesuareagreementmap-and-cachedregisteredalloypoolbyalloydenommap) The poolmanager module exists as a swap entrypoint for any pool model
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
networks/genesis-validators.md(2 hunks)simulation/simtypes/randmanager_test.go(2 hunks)x/poolmanager/README.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- networks/genesis-validators.md
- simulation/simtypes/randmanager_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (4)
x/poolmanager/README.md (4)
Line range hint 1-24: LGTM! Clear module overview and objectives.
The introduction effectively explains the module's purpose and user stories. The documentation clearly outlines the two main responsibilities: pool creation and swap handling.
Line range hint 26-116: LGTM! Well-documented pool creation and ID management section.
The section thoroughly explains:
- Pool ID management
- CreatePool message flow
- Pool type enumeration
- Module routing mechanism
Line range hint 198-520: LGTM! Comprehensive explanation of trade estimation.
The section provides detailed explanations of trade estimation processes for different pool types (Balancer, StableSwap, and Concentrated Liquidity), including edge cases and error handling.
Line range hint 894-958: LGTM! Clear explanation of caching mechanisms.
The caching section effectively explains:
- Purpose of each cache
- Cache initialization
- Cache usage patterns
|
Changes Made:
Reason:
These documentation-only fixes improve readability and maintain consistent project name spelling throughout the docs. No functional code changes.