Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update (remove) .tn entries #1426

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2021
Merged

Conversation

smoussa2021
Copy link
Contributor

@smoussa2021 smoussa2021 commented Sep 20, 2021

  • Description of Organization

  • Reason for PSL Inclusion

  • DNS verification via dig

  • Run Syntax Checker (make test)

  • Each domain listed in the PRIVATE section has and shall maintain at least two years remaining on registration, and we shall keep the _PSL txt record in place

Submitter affirms the following:

  • We are listing any third party limits that we seek to work around in our rationale such as those between IOS 14.5+ and Facebook (see Issue #1245 as a well-documented example)
  • This request was not submitted with the objective of working around other third party limits
  • The Guidelines were carefully read and understood, and this request conforms
  • The submission follows the guidelines on formatting

For Private section requests that are submitting entries for domains that match their organization website's primary domain:

Seriously, carefully read the downline flow of the PSL and the guidelines.
Your request could very likely alter the cookie and certificate (as well as other) behaviours on your 
core domain name in ways that could be problematic for your business.

Rollback is really not predicatable, as those who use or incorporate the PSL do what they do, and when.
It is not within the PSL volunteers' control to do anything about that.  

The volunteers are busy with new requests, and rollbacks are lowest priority, so if something gets broken 
it will stay that way for an indefinitely long while.

(Link: about propogation/expectations)

  • Yes, I understand. I could break my organization's website cookies etc. and the rollback timing, etc is acceptable. Proceed.

Description of Organization

Whois WebSite: https://whois.ati.tn
Organization Website: https://www.ati.tn
First E-mail Contact: [email protected]
Second E-mail Contact: [email protected]

Reason for PSL Inclusion

Listed sub-extensions are passed to domains under .TN.
DEFENSE.TN, RNU.TN , RNRT.TN, TUREN.TN, RNS.TN, EDUNET.TN and AGRINET.TN

They are no longer sub-extensions under which registrants can register domains.

Decision of the national telecommunication regulator, INTT:
http://www.intt.tn/upload/txts/fr/decision_du_college_de_l'int_n11-2020_du_23_dec_2020.pdf

DNS Verification via dig

dig +short TXT _psl.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.com.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.ens.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.fin.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.gov.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.ind.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.info.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.intl.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.mincom.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.nat.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.net.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.org.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.perso.tn
"#1426"

dig +short TXT _psl.tourism.tn
"#1426"

make test

Test ran and it was Ok.
Extensions list updated at https://www.ati.tn/nom-de-domaine/

Listed sub-extensions are passed to domains under .TN.
DEFENSE.TN, RNU.TN , RNRT.TN, TUREN.TN, RNS.TN, EDUNET.TN and AGRINET.TN

They are no longer sub-extensions under which registrants can register domains.

Decision of the national telecommunication regulator, INTT:
http://www.intt.tn/upload/txts/fr/decision_du_college_de_l'int_n11-2020_du_23_dec_2020.pdf
@dnsguru
Copy link
Member

dnsguru commented Sep 20, 2021

IANA .TN Entry lists ati.tn as NIC, for context

@dnsguru
Copy link
Member

dnsguru commented Sep 20, 2021

I viewed the ati.tr website, which is the NIC for .tn as identified by the IANA. The NIC's domain name page shows the following namespaces available:

  • .tn
  • .agrinet.tn
  • .com.tn
  • .edunet.tn
  • .ens.tn
  • .fin.tn
  • .gov.tn
  • .ind.tn
  • .info.tn
  • .intl.tn
  • .mincom.tn
  • .nat.tn
  • .net.tn
  • .org.tn
  • .perso.tn
  • .rnrt.tn
  • .rns.tn
  • .rnu.tn
  • .tourism.tn
  • .turen.tn

This list comes from the only verifiable source that we can follow Authority from the IANA to .TN, and it does not seem to match the requested changes to the PSL.

While the letter referenced does appear official, it is sourced from a domain outside of the NIC and the affected extensions were not submitted with DNS proof. The _psl txt records for info.tn and minicom.tn are different than those of the ones requested for removal. Additionally, the verification of these txt records from 8.8.8.8 or other public resolvers fails at this time.

IF there are working DNS Proof tags (_psl) placed inside of ati.tn or .tn itself, or the affected strings that are requested for removal so that we can make a verification, it will help to further review on how to proceed.

@dnsguru dnsguru self-assigned this Sep 20, 2021
@dnsguru dnsguru added ❌FAIL - DNS VALIDATION Unable to confirm _PSL TXT = This PR # (also see #1439) NOT IOS FB Submitter attests PR is not #1245 related 🩺 pending-validation Something needs to be validated waiting-followup Blocked for need of follow-up labels Sep 20, 2021
@dnsguru dnsguru changed the title Update public_suffix_list.dat Update (remove) .tn entries Sep 20, 2021
@dnsguru dnsguru mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2021
10 tasks
@smoussa2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

IANA .TN Entry lists ati.tn as NIC, for context

Extensions list updated at https://www.ati.tn/nom-de-domaine/
And DNS verification is ok.

@dnsguru
Copy link
Member

dnsguru commented Sep 21, 2021

Wow, very impressive and thorough, @smoussa2021 you have indicated administrative control of this namespace is tied to this PR and have validated it to my satisfaction by placing the DNS records.

Confirmed Locally:
~/.ssh$ dig +short TXT _psl.tn
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/1426"

Confirmed Globally:

~/.ssh$ dig +short TXT _psl.tn 8.8.8.8
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/1426"

~/.ssh$ dig +short TXT _psl.tn 1.1.1.1
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/1426"

~/.ssh$ dig +short TXT _psl.tn 9.9.9.9
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/1426"

@dnsguru dnsguru added r=dnsguru Marked as approved and ready to merge by @dnsguru and removed ❌FAIL - DNS VALIDATION Unable to confirm _PSL TXT = This PR # (also see #1439) 🩺 pending-validation Something needs to be validated waiting-followup Blocked for need of follow-up labels Sep 21, 2021
Copy link
Member

@dnsguru dnsguru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • DNS Validation ok
  • Tests ok
  • Rationale ok
  • No conflict with base
  • Formatted / Sorted per Guidelines

Approved

@dnsguru dnsguru merged commit 1bdac33 into publicsuffix:master Sep 21, 2021
@dnsguru
Copy link
Member

dnsguru commented Sep 21, 2021

@smoussa2021 this is completed.

@smoussa2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the time you spent for us.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NOT IOS FB Submitter attests PR is not #1245 related r=dnsguru Marked as approved and ready to merge by @dnsguru
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants