Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add PSL Sandbox #2358

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add PSL Sandbox #2358

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

wdhdev
Copy link
Contributor

@wdhdev wdhdev commented Dec 25, 2024

The goal for this section of the PSL is to create a sandbox for testing the affects of different rules on the PSL.

This implements #1349.

The sandbox hasn't been deployed yet, however once these entries are listed I will deploy one so users can test out various differences domains have for when they are on the PSL.

Note: I have added these under subdomains of psl.hrsn.dev in order to prevent any potential problems or overlaps with the existence of the hrsn.dev rule. Also, I've added this in a new section as I would like these entries to remain as a separate "project" to Harrison Network specifically.

It also might be worth noting that these will be the first exception rules ! in the private section.

All _psl TXT records have been put in place for the corresponding names.

@wdhdev wdhdev marked this pull request as draft December 25, 2024 04:41
@wdhdev wdhdev marked this pull request as ready for review December 25, 2024 04:52
@simon-friedberger
Copy link
Contributor

I've considered doing something like this but adding testing entries to the production PSL should at least have clear goals. What exactly would we be testing and how?

@wdhdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

wdhdev commented Dec 25, 2024

My goal for these entries would be to test cookie setting across through a web interface. With the results from these tests we could also make the wiki more specific on how cookied are affected.

Also, it would allow people to test the effects of the PSL without having to add a staging domain to the list.

@dnsguru
Copy link
Member

dnsguru commented Dec 26, 2024

We ended up shooting #1349 behind the woodshed. I think the premise of allowing cookie testing for a requestor is good.

IF we set something like this up as the project, I suggest we should probably do so under publicsuffix.org domain vs one any of us individually are operating.

@wdhdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

wdhdev commented Dec 26, 2024

Having it under publicsuffix.org would be good. Obviously I don't have access to the domain, so I just configured it on one of mine.

Would we be able to configure some entries on publicsuffix.org?

@dnsguru
Copy link
Member

dnsguru commented Dec 26, 2024

Let's discuss what we would hope to see accomplished in such a test, and then determine if the juice to squeeze is worth it on dealing with Mozilla's IT kafka pain to get records set up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants