Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CODEOWNERS #193

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MattKotsenas
Copy link
Collaborator

@MattKotsenas MattKotsenas commented Aug 29, 2024

Add a CODEOWNERS file so we're automatically tagged for review when PRs are opened.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a CODEOWNERS file to establish default ownership for repository files, enhancing accountability and streamlining the review process.
  • Improvements
    • Designated primary owners for all files, ensuring that changes involve specific reviewers for better code quality and consistency.

@MattKotsenas MattKotsenas requested a review from rjmurillo August 29, 2024 16:56
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The introduction of the CODEOWNERS file establishes a default ownership policy for the repository. It assigns users @rjmurillo and @mattkotsenas as primary owners for all files and directories. This ensures that any changes or pull requests will involve these individuals as reviewers unless specified otherwise.

Changes

File Change Summary
CODEOWNERS Added a default ownership policy designating @rjmurillo and @mattkotsenas as owners for all files and directories.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Repository
    participant CODEOWNERS

    User->>Repository: Create Pull Request
    Repository->>CODEOWNERS: Check ownership
    CODEOWNERS-->>Repository: Return owners
    Repository->>User: Notify owners for review
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MattKotsenas MattKotsenas enabled auto-merge (squash) August 29, 2024 16:56
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit c5e050e and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ee11a9 and c5e050e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
CODEOWNERS (2)

1-1: LGTM!

The comment line is clear and provides necessary context.


2-2: LGTM!

The ownership assignment is correctly formatted and follows best practices.

@MattKotsenas MattKotsenas merged commit 6945f41 into rjmurillo:main Aug 29, 2024
9 checks passed
@rjmurillo rjmurillo added this to the vNext milestone Aug 29, 2024
@MattKotsenas MattKotsenas deleted the feature/codeowners branch August 29, 2024 17:08
@rjmurillo rjmurillo modified the milestones: vNext, v0.2.0 Oct 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants