Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: add support for managing EFS provisioned throughput #9

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

wvanheerde
Copy link
Collaborator

@wvanheerde wvanheerde commented Dec 23, 2024

This PR adds support for managing EFS Filesystem resources with provisioned throughput, by scaling their provisioned throughput to 1 on composition stop - and back to their original value on composition start.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success

Terraform Initialization ⚙️``

Terraform Lint 📖success

Terraform Validation 🤖success

Validation Output

Success! The configuration is valid.


@wvanheerde wvanheerde changed the title Add support for efs throughput feat: add support for efs throughput Dec 23, 2024
@wvanheerde wvanheerde changed the title feat: add support for efs throughput feature: add support for efs throughput Dec 23, 2024
@wvanheerde wvanheerde added the feature New feature or request label Dec 23, 2024
@wvanheerde wvanheerde changed the title feature: add support for efs throughput feature: add support for managing EFS provisioned throughput Dec 23, 2024
@wvanheerde wvanheerde marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2024 12:15
Copy link

@fernandogoncalves-me fernandogoncalves-me left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@wvanheerde wvanheerde merged commit b3733a1 into main Dec 23, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants