Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 2.0.7 to 2.2.2 #44

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

anseliv
Copy link

@anseliv anseliv commented Jun 19, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements.txt

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-7267250
@PAY2109
Copy link
Collaborator

PAY2109 commented Jun 24, 2024

Right now SDK automatically installs urllib3 v2.2.2 anyway, so implicit specification of this should not break anything.

@PAY2109 PAY2109 requested review from sassless and mabredin June 24, 2024 15:34
Copy link
Member

@kiruxaspb kiruxaspb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will be added in the next Pull Request

@kiruxaspb
Copy link
Member

Fixed in #54

@kiruxaspb kiruxaspb closed this Jul 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants