update editorial strings

site/src/lib/constants/strings.json

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 {
   "mission_statement": "This website seeks to collect public statements from those supporting Israel's mass displacement, starvation, and murder of Palestinians, and to contrast their statements with the human toll of Israel's campaign.",
   "mission_short": "We collect the public statements from those supporting Israel's mass displacement, starvation, and murder of Palestinians, and put them in context.",
-  "editorial_intro": "In the process of collecting statements for an individual or group, we determine whether one or more of the following categories applies to their statement. If a category applies, that statement is a candidate for inclusion. Some categories overlap, but will fit better in some scenarios over others.",
+  "editorial_intro": "In the process of collecting statements for an individual or group, we determine whether one or more of the following categories applies to their statement. If a category applies, that statement is a candidate for inclusion.",
   "tag_denial_head": "Denial",
-  "tag_denial_para": "Denial doesn't have to be explicit. It can also be implicit through obfuscation or intentional omission. This can also appear as willful ignorance. This negative form of denial is hard to prove in isolation given it won't be clearly stated. A series of statements taken together over time, however, can signal an intentional act of omission. This has been a very common tool of those trying to shape the narrative to fit Israel's strategy in Gaza. Often this is exhibited when nearly all of a person's statements omit any reference to the Palestinian perspective or the impact of Israel's actions on that population. These statements can seem detached from reality. We'll include statements from individuals who have taken a clear stance in support of Israel's actions while exhibiting denial of the impact or illegality of those actions because this implies an acceptance of those acts. We'll typically include a sampling of these statements to demonstrate the concerted effort of this over time and to contrast that trend with the human toll of Israel's acts.",
+  "tag_denial_para": "Denial doesn't have to be explicit. It can also be implicit through obfuscation or intentional omission. This can also appear as willful ignorance. This negative form of denial is hard to prove in isolation given it won't be clearly stated. A series of statements taken together over time, however, can signal an intentional act of omission. This has been a very common tool of those trying to shape the narrative to fit Israel's strategy in Gaza. Often this is exhibited when nearly all of a person's statements omit any reference to the Palestinian perspective or the impact of Israel's actions on that population. These statements can seem detached from reality. We'll include statements from individuals who have taken a clear stance in support of Israel's actions while exhibiting denial of the impact or potential illegality of those actions. Taken together, such statements imply an acceptance of those actions and their impacts. We'll typically include a sampling of these statements to demonstrate the concerted effort over time and to contrast that trend with the human toll of Israel's acts.",
   "tag_discrimination_head": "Discrimination",
-  "tag_discrimination_para": "Discrimination often comes in the form of xenophobia or racism. Islamophobia is closely related. A common example of this in recent days is claiming pro-Palestinian protests or vigils are \"hateful\", or associating the attendees of a gathering as supporters of Hamas or Iran without merit. We may categorize statements that make accusations of antisemitism as discriminatory if they also lack merit (according to the framework defined by the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, 2020) and there's reasonable grounds to believe the accuser did so in a discriminatory way.",
+  "tag_discrimination_para": "Discrimination often comes in the form of xenophobia or racism. Islamophobia is closely related. A common example of this in recent days is claiming pro-Palestinian protests or vigils are \"hateful\", or associating the attendees of a gathering as supporters of Hamas or Iran without merit. We may also categorize statements that make accusations of antisemitism as discriminatory if they are unfounded (according to the framework defined by the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, 2020) and there's reasonable grounds to believe the accuser did so in a discriminatory way.",
   "tag_dehumanisation_head": "Dehumanisation",
   "tag_dehumanisation_para": "This category is perhaps the most insidious, as it involves broad generalisations about a group of people that take away their individual humanity. The common claim of \"human shields\" is one. Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant's statement that Gazans are \"human animals\" is another very clear example.",
   "tag_incitement_head": "Incitement",
-  "tag_incitement_para": "This class of statements are hard to miss given the aggressive nature and can include calling for violence against people or the persecution of a group.",
+  "tag_incitement_para": "This class of statements are hard to miss given the aggressive nature. This can include calling for violence against people or the persecution of a group.",
   "tag_classification_head": "Classification",
   "tag_classification_para": "Classification is an effort to divide people into groups (\"us\" vs \"them\") based on perceived differences or stereotypes. This can be used to stoke fear or create the appearance of a lack of common humanity. Employing classification often means using carefully crafted narratives that twist reality. This commonly manifests as overly biased or caricatured statements, or outright boosting of government or military propaganda.",
   "contact": "You can contact us at [email protected]."