Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(plugins/dbLite): add test for merge function #5603

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2023

Conversation

halibobo1205
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@halibobo1205 halibobo1205 added the area:test change in test label Nov 27, 2023
@halibobo1205 halibobo1205 added this to the GreatVoyage-v4.7.4 milestone Nov 27, 2023
@halibobo1205 halibobo1205 self-assigned this Nov 27, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (be07f5c) 66.30% compared to head (713302f) 66.40%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #5603      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      66.30%   66.40%   +0.10%     
- Complexity     10193    10214      +21     
=============================================
  Files            894      894              
  Lines          53852    53852              
  Branches        5936     5936              
=============================================
+ Hits           35709    35763      +54     
+ Misses         15358    15295      -63     
- Partials        2785     2794       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ void testTools(String dbType, int checkpointVersion)
}
// start and validate the snapshot
startApp();
generateSomeTransactions(6);
generateSomeTransactions(checkpointVersion == 1 ? 18 : 6);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it reasonable for the same function to produce the same input but have inconsistent actual execution logic?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR is designed to test different logic.

@halibobo1205 halibobo1205 merged commit a76e177 into develop Dec 27, 2023
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:test change in test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants