Split methods for HikariTransactor constructed with two effects

[jatcwang]

Partially revert the change in #1939 so that existing code don't fail to compile. Methods which construct HikariTransactor in a different effect now has the suffix "...SeparateEffect". The original single-effect methods are now implemented in terms of the separate-effect methods.

Related: #1939

[jatcwang]

@satorg @sideeffffect Feedback welcome especially the name..it's a bit long 😅

[sideeffffect]

Maybe ...Generic instead of ...SeparateEffect, because that's veeery long?

[jatcwang]

Or maybe ...WithResEffect (With Resource Effect)? 🤔

[satorg]

@jatcwang thank you for taking on it!

I personally don't have a strict preference on the naming.
I could suggest though a conciser suffix ...M2 (e.g. fromConfigCustomEcM2). The idea behind such a suffix is the following:
...sometimes effectful methods are marked with the F suffix (because of F[_])
...doobie prefers M[_] and in this case introduces two M-s – M and M0, so the overall suffix could be M2.

But I totally realize that such a name could look cryptic and for me personally any of the suggested names above will work just as well.

[jatcwang]

For this case I don't mind it being a bit longer since it's often only written once in an application. I think ...WithResEffect is probably the clearest to me. ..Generic is short but doesn't feel too descriptive of what's happening

[sideeffffect]

Let's get this merged

[jatcwang]

Thanks all.