Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ci): dependencies update only if build is passed #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

cTux
Copy link
Collaborator

@cTux cTux commented Nov 16, 2023

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue/task. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Task link

Specify if have one.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@cTux cTux self-assigned this Nov 16, 2023
@cTux cTux merged commit ce70df9 into develop Nov 16, 2023
3 checks passed
@cTux cTux deleted the fix/deps-update-script branch November 16, 2023 11:57
Copy link
Contributor

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Dependencies update script improvement
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR improves the dependencies update script by adding ESLint and Build steps to the workflow.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the changes are straightforward and mainly consist of adding new steps to the workflow.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: - Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the added steps in the workflow.

  • Ensure that the script is properly tested and that the new steps do not introduce any issues.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: .github/workflows/dependencies-update.yml
      suggestion: Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the added steps in the workflow. [medium]
      relevant line: - name: Running ESLint

    • relevant file: .github/workflows/dependencies-update.yml
      suggestion: Ensure that the script is properly tested and that the new steps do not introduce any issues. [important]
      relevant line: - name: Running Build

    • relevant file: .github/workflows/dependencies-update.yml
      suggestion: Consider using more descriptive names for the steps in the workflow. [medium]
      relevant line: - name: Run command

    • relevant file: .github/workflows/dependencies-update.yml
      suggestion: Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the 'Run command' step in the workflow. [medium]
      relevant line: - name: Run command

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant