Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Server image cleanup #9577

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cbosdo
Copy link
Contributor

@cbosdo cbosdo commented Dec 16, 2024

What does this PR change?

Reduce the number of unneeded layers by grouping the RUN commands and all the files in an ADD from a tarball.
Also remove depending on packages added in the container by the CI to allow removing the repos from the image.

GUI diff

No difference.

  • DONE

Documentation

  • No documentation needed: only internal and user invisible changes

  • DONE

Test coverage

ℹ️ If a major new functionality is added, it is strongly recommended that tests for the new functionality are added to the Cucumber test suite

  • No tests: cucumber tests changed

  • DONE

Links

Issue(s): #
Port(s): # add downstream PR(s), if any

  • DONE

Changelogs

Make sure the changelogs entries you are adding are compliant with https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Contributing#changelogs and https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Contributing#uyuni-projectuyuni-repository

If you don't need a changelog check, please mark this checkbox:

  • No changelog needed

If you uncheck the checkbox after the PR is created, you will need to re-run changelog_test (see below)

Re-run a test

If you need to re-run a test, please mark the related checkbox, it will be unchecked automatically once it has re-run:

  • Re-run test "changelog_test"
  • Re-run test "backend_unittests_pgsql"
  • Re-run test "java_pgsql_tests"
  • Re-run test "schema_migration_test_pgsql"
  • Re-run test "susemanager_unittests"
  • Re-run test "javascript_lint"
  • Re-run test "spacecmd_unittests"

Before you merge

Check How to branch and merge properly!

@cbosdo cbosdo requested review from a team as code owners December 16, 2024 10:42
@cbosdo cbosdo requested review from meaksh and removed request for a team December 16, 2024 10:42
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hello! Thanks for contributing to our project.
Acceptance tests will take some time (aprox. 1h), please be patient ☕
You can see the progress at the end of this page and at https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/pull/9577/checks
Once tests finish, if they fail, you can check 👀 the cucumber report. See the link at the output of the action.
You can also check the artifacts section, which contains the logs at https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/pull/9577/checks.

If you are unsure the failing tests are related to your code, you can check the "reference jobs". These are jobs that run on a scheduled time with code from master. If they fail for the same reason as your build, it means the tests or the infrastructure are broken. If they do not fail, but yours do, it means it is related to your code.

Reference tests:

KNOWN ISSUES

Sometimes the build can fail when pulling new jar files from download.opensuse.org . This is a known limitation. Given this happens rarely, when it does, all you need to do is rerun the test. Sorry for the inconvenience.

For more tips on troubleshooting, see the troubleshooting guide.

Happy hacking!
⚠️ You should not merge if acceptance tests fail to pass. ⚠️

OBS cannot handle folders as sources, compress a folder named root in
the container folder into a root.tar.gz before pushing to OBS.
@cbosdo cbosdo force-pushed the server-image-cleanup branch from f5671f0 to 57ada03 Compare December 16, 2024 10:46
In order to remove the repositories from the container image the
testsuite needs to stop relying on sumaform to add any package like
expect.
In order to remove the need to install OpenIPMI in the server container,
prepare a container image to run the fake IPMI server.
@cbosdo cbosdo force-pushed the server-image-cleanup branch from 57ada03 to 9b032f1 Compare December 16, 2024 10:50
Comment on lines +1387 to +1388
node = get_target('server')
mgrctl = node.has_mgrctl ? 'mgrctl' : ''
Copy link
Member

@srbarrios srbarrios Dec 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was a bit hard to understand the first time that I read it :)
But ok.

(I like the approach on the expect files, as this way we can keep the source code aligned between 4.3 and 5.0)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just maybe, we can reduce one line by directly using true/false values coming from node.has_mgrctl instead of mapping those to 'mgrctl'/''.
But a matter of taste.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not an expert in expect syntax. I can try your suggestion, I have no clue if that will be properly interpreted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants