Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Be more specific about when the council composition is locked down #955

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Dec 6, 2024

This drafts option 1 of #926


Preview | Diff

@frivoal frivoal added the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Dec 6, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2024/2025 milestone Dec 6, 2024
@plehegar
Copy link
Member

Unless there is new information by December 20, this pull request will get merged.

Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reasonable solution to this ambiguity.

Comment on lines +2442 to +2443
Specifically, the list of potential [=Council=] members evolves
as terms start or end
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Specifically, the list of potential [=Council=] members evolves
as terms start or end
The list of potential [=Council=] members evolves
as terms start and end

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@frivoal frivoal Dec 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok with swapping or for and, but why remove specifically? My intent was to indicate that this is a clarification of the previous sentence, rather than an additional requirement. I guess I'd be ok with turning the period at the end of the previous sentence into a colon instead of saying Specifically at the start of the next one, but having neither weakens the link between the two statements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants