feat: support for ostree systems

[richm]

Feature: Allow running and testing the role with ostree managed nodes.

Reason: We have users who want to use the role to manage ostree
systems.

Result: Users can use the role to manage ostree managed nodes.
Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson [email protected]

[Jakuje]

From the failing CI, the Fedora is fixed with top commit in #267, debian buster is probably just broken (can be ignored), but centos6 is something that should be fixed as part of this PR as the man-db requirement was introduced/changed here.

[richm]

From the failing CI, the Fedora is fixed with top commit in #267, debian buster is probably just broken (can be ignored), but centos6 is something that should be fixed as part of this PR as the man-db requirement was introduced/changed here.

ok - do you want to merge #267 then I can rebase?

[Jakuje]

From the failing CI, the Fedora is fixed with top commit in #267, debian buster is probably just broken (can be ignored), but centos6 is something that should be fixed as part of this PR as the man-db requirement was introduced/changed here.

ok - do you want to merge #267 then I can rebase?

Whatever works for you. The #267 changes a lot of things, but they are not used by default so they should not be breaking (but some careful review would be needed). It does not have any deadlines as far as I know.

If the ostree support needs to land at some reasonable time, feel free to pull that particular commit from there into your PR.

[richm]

From the failing CI, the Fedora is fixed with top commit in #267, debian buster is probably just broken (can be ignored), but centos6 is something that should be fixed as part of this PR as the man-db requirement was introduced/changed here.

ok - do you want to merge #267 then I can rebase?

Whatever works for you. The #267 changes a lot of things, but they are not used by default so they should not be breaking (but some careful review would be needed). It does not have any deadlines as far as I know.

If the ostree support needs to land at some reasonable time, feel free to pull that particular commit from there into your PR.

ok - I just fixed the el6 issue - please review - then we can wait on #267 - I did not include that one in my PR - should keep them separate