Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LCP & Above the Fold Optimization #6311

Merged
merged 227 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

remyperona
Copy link
Contributor

@remyperona remyperona commented Dec 7, 2023

Description

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change requires a documentation update.

Checklists

Generic development checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project, with adapted comments and without new warnings.
  • I have added unit and integration tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • The CI passes locally with my changes (including unit tests, integration tests, linter).

Test summary

  • I triggered all changed lines of code at least once without new errors/warnings/notices.
  • I validated all Acceptance Criteria of the related issues. (If applicable, provide proof).
  • I validated all test plan the QA Review asked me to.

@remyperona remyperona added module: media epics 🔥 For large tasks or features, broken into smaller issues. labels Dec 7, 2023
@remyperona remyperona added this to the 3.16 milestone Dec 7, 2023
@piotrbak piotrbak removed this from the 3.16 milestone Feb 12, 2024
@remyperona remyperona marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2024 19:14
@remyperona remyperona merged commit afe019d into branch-3.16 Apr 29, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@remyperona remyperona deleted the feature/lcp-above-the-fold-optimization branch April 29, 2024 19:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
epics 🔥 For large tasks or features, broken into smaller issues. module: media
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants