Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Host google fonts locally #7164

Draft
wants to merge 116 commits into
base: feature/3.18
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

wordpressfan
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes #(issue number)
Explain how this code impacts users.

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which improves an existing functionality).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as before).
  • Sub-task of #(issue number)
  • Chore
  • Release

Detailed scenario

Explain how to reproduce the issue (for bugs) or how to trigger the new code. You can refer to the GitHub issue or grooming if it is still applicable.

Technical description

Documentation

Explain how this code works. Diagrams & drawings are welcome.

New dependencies

List any new dependencies that are required for this change.

Risks

List possible performance & security issues or risks, and explain how they have been mitigated.

Mandatory Checklist

Code validation

  • I validated all the Acceptance Criteria. If possible, provide screenshots or videos.
  • I triggered all changed lines of code at least once without new errors/warnings/notices.
  • I implemented built-in tests to cover the new/changed code.

Code style

  • I wrote a self-explanatory code about what it does.
  • I protected entry points against unexpected inputs.
  • I did not introduce unnecessary complexity.
  • Output messages (errors, notices, logs) are explicit enough for users to understand the issue and are actionnable.

Unticked items justification

If some mandatory items are not relevant, explain why in this section.

Additional Checks

  • In the case of complex code, I wrote comments to explain it.
  • When possible, I prepared ways to observe the implemented system (logs, data, etc.).
  • I added error handling logic when using functions that could throw errors (HTTP/API request, filesystem, etc.)

@remyperona remyperona added the type: new feature Indicates the issue is a request for new functionality label Dec 4, 2024
@remyperona remyperona added this to the 3.18 milestone Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: new feature Indicates the issue is a request for new functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants