Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Spring Cleanup] Remove Spring dependencies in the email template management API #694

Conversation

NipuniBhagya
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

This PR removes dependencies and usages of the Spring framework in the email template management REST API.

Related Issue(s)


static {
EmailTemplateManager emailTemplateManager = EmailTemplatesServiceHolder.getEmailTemplateManager();

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

extra line

@@ -174,5 +170,11 @@
<groupId>org.wso2.carbon.identity.server.api</groupId>
<artifactId>org.wso2.carbon.identity.api.server.email.template.common</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.wso2.carbon.identity.server.api</groupId>
<artifactId>org.wso2.carbon.identity.rest.api.server.email.template.v1</artifactId>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why we need this?

<dependency>
<groupId>org.wso2.carbon.identity.server.api</groupId>
<artifactId>org.wso2.carbon.identity.rest.api.server.email.template.v1</artifactId>
<version>1.2.228-SNAPSHOT</version>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove version from component level pom file

@lashinijay
Copy link
Contributor

Comments will be addressed with #756

@lashinijay lashinijay merged commit dcf421e into wso2:feature-spring-cleanup Dec 9, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants