Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform to v5.16.0 - autoclosed #3777

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform 5.15.0 -> 5.16.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

java-native-access/jna (net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform)

v5.16.0

Compare Source

==============

Features

  • #​1626: Add caching of field list and field validation in Structure along with more efficient reentrant read-write locking instead of synchronized() blocks - @​BrettWooldridge

Bug Fixes


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@forking-renovate forking-renovate bot added the dependencies A dependency upgrade label Dec 22, 2024
@renovate-bot renovate-bot changed the title Update dependency net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform to v5.16.0 Update dependency net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform to v5.16.0 - autoclosed Dec 24, 2024
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/net.java.dev.jna-jna-platform-5.x branch December 24, 2024 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies A dependency upgrade
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants